There is no real person known as gurubuster it is simply Sandeep arsing around to make some kind of a point!
Sent from an iPhone On 22 Apr 2011, at 05:25, Gurubuster <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Apr 22, 1:09 am, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: >> and let's not forget about the soup-bowl of notions, >> >> known as Gurubuster....... > > > > > > No need to forget, as no need to remember either. > > If apperception is not immediate, it is a baloney sandwich. > > That, which needs time to understand, that which develops in time, > that which stabilizes in time, that which deepens in time... > > ....no matter how profound it's dimensions.... > > ...is a mere projection of the notion(as thought) that stuff > happens...... > > > .....such a notion itself being a projection of the primary notion > that duration is a reality, that time is a reality, > > ....that change is a reality.. > > ..(stuff happening is just the belief of the stuffing changing, > otherwise no event could ever be cognized as an event)) > > > ..... thereby that comparison is a possibility. > > > > > > Even the term "immediate" depends for its existence as contratsed with > the term "duration" and thus arises only within the sense of something > as time. > > Just like there is nothing as a "now" which can exist other than as a > contrast to a "then". > > Just like there is nothing as a "here" which can exist other than as a > contrast to a "there". > > > > > > That immediacy which is not the opposite of "time-dependancy"; > > That now which is not the opposite of then; > > That here which is not the opposite of there; > > .........signatures on flowing waters. > > > > > > > > > > > > >
