> I think VS2005 is Heads and Shoulders above VS2003. There's a few quirks
> with the Forms designer and build state, but other than that, nothing bad
> springs to mind. (Presuming you have GB's of RAM... anything less than 1GB
> is torture)
I see you never did any ASP.NET development or a lot of Winforms GUI
development...
FB
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 4:09 AM
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] has there been a service pack for .net 2.0?
>
> Is anyone else dissatisfiedIs anyone else dissatisfied with the tools for
> VS2005. I have been using VS2005 for about 10 months and find it very
> buggy.
>
> I also had the misfortune to use SQL Server 2005 SSIS which was a most
> regrettable experience.
>
> Microsoft being Microsoft, there is no service pack and they are forging
> ahead with .NET 3.0 without a care to their current toolset being riddled
> with bugs.
> Does everyone use VS 2005 or is there maybe a better alternative to this way
> of developing.
>
> I love the framework but hate the tools.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:19:45 -0600> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] has there been a service pack for .net 2.0?>
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> > On my Windows Vista Ultimate x64
> RTM, the version is 2.0.50727.312> > > -----Original Message-----> From:
> Discussion of advanced .NET topics.>
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Hill> Sent:
> Wednesday, November 22, 2006 6:38 PM> To:
> ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] has
> there been a service pack for .net 2.0?> > > -----Original Message-----> >
> From: Julia Lerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday,
> November 20, 2006 7:44 PM> > Subject: Re: has there been a service pack for
> .net 2.0?> >> > There will be some "tweaks" to .NET 2.0 framework to avoid
> some> > compatibility issues with the .NET 3.0 APIs.> >> > Quoting Scott
> Nonnenburg who left this comment on one of my blog posts:> > "We've made
> SP-level fixes to .NET 2.0 components, doing our best to avoid> > breaking
> changes."> >> > Perhaps that explains why .NET 2.0 on XP (2.0.50727.42) is
> different than> .NET 2.0 on Vista (2.0.50727.308)?> > --> Keith> >
> ===================================> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor.
> http://www.develop.com> > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://discuss.develop.com> > ===================================> This list
> is hosted by DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com> > View archives and
> manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
> ===================================
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com
>
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
>
> ===================================
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com
>
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
