So far, we have a very good experience with Together Designer 2006 from
Borland. Light years away from the toy designer in VS 2005.

http://www.borland.com/downloads/download_together.html 

Sébastien

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 8:46 PM
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] has there been a service pack for .net
> 2.0?
> 
> I find the SQL Server 2005 tools also a nightmare.
> I did a lengthy SSIS project which nearly finished me off.
> 
> Because the SSIS packages's native format is xml it was taking
> sometimes 20 minutes to load the project.
> The management studio crashes.
> We have also bought into the whole Team Foundation Server which dare I
> say is also buggy.
> MSBuild is just a poor man's NAnt and the Unit testing project is a
> poor man's NUnit.
> Still regardless of the present issues, they just plough on with VS
> 2020 or whatever.
> I am annoyed.  Is there a good case tool that can be used for .NET
> which will constantly update my model and vice versa?
> Am I alone in hating the class designer with Microsoft's typical own
> version of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:30:26 -0600> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] has there been a service pack for .net
> 2.0?> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> > I hope when I grow up
> I can be a cool programmer like you, maybe I'll find> out what that
> build menu does soon.> > -----Original Message-----> From: Discussion
> of advanced .NET topics.> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Frans Bouma> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 5:57 AM>
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET]
> has there been a service pack for .net 2.0?> > > You're right. I just
> play with the toolbars.. there's so many icons to> play> > with .> >
> seriously: anyone who says that vs.net 2005 is very useful, hasn't>
> done a lot of webform/winform development. I can crank> out a lot of
> code for libraries in a couple of hours but with> webforms/winforms
> stuff, it simply stops, there are so many little> stupid things which
> raise the stressbar and make you stop being productive> it's stunning.>
> > The webform editor alone is IMHO reason enough to quit Atlas dev for>
> now and move the team to fixing the stuff people have> to work with
> TODAY.> > FB> > >> >> > -----Original Message-----> > From: Discussion
> of advanced .NET topics.> > [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frans Bouma> > Sent: Thursday,
> November 23, 2006 5:19 AM> > To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> >
> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] has there been a service pack for .net
> 2.0?> >> > > I think VS2005 is Heads and Shoulders above VS2003.
> There's a few> quirks> > > with the Forms designer and build state, but
> other than that, nothing> bad> > > springs to mind. (Presuming you have
> GB's of RAM... anything less than> 1GB> > > is torture)> >> > I see you
> never did any ASP.NET development or a lot of Winforms> GUI> >
> development...> >> > FB> >> > >> > >> > > -----Original Message-----> >
> > From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.> > > [mailto:ADVANCED-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cowan> > > Sent: Thursday,
> November 23, 2006 4:09 AM> > > To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM>
> > > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] has there been a service pack
> for .net> 2.0?> > >> > > Is anyone else dissatisfiedIs anyone else
> dissatisfied with the tools> for> > > VS2005. I have been using VS2005
> for about 10 months and find it very> > > buggy.> > >> > > I also had
> the misfortune to use SQL Server 2005 SSIS which was a most> > >
> regrettable experience.> > >> > > Microsoft being Microsoft, there is
> no service pack and they are forging> > > ahead with .NET 3.0 without a
> care to their current toolset being> riddled> > > with bugs.> > > Does
> everyone use VS 2005 or is there maybe a better alternative to this> >
> way> > > of developing.> > >> > > I love the framework but hate the
> tools.> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006
> 19:19:45 -0600> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > Subject: Re:
> [ADVANCED-DOTNET] has there been a service pack for .net> > 2.0?>> > >
> To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> > On my Windows Vista
> Ultimate> > x64> > > RTM, the version is 2.0.50727.312> > > -----
> Original Message-----> From:> > > Discussion of advanced .NET topics.>>
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith
> Hill>> > Sent:> > > Wednesday, November 22, 2006 6:38 PM> To:> > >
> ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM> Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET]
> has> > > there been a service pack for .net 2.0?> > > -----Original
> Message----->> >> > > From: Julia Lerman
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday,> > > November 20,
> 2006 7:44 PM> > Subject: Re: has there been a service pack> > for> >
> > .net 2.0?> >> > There will be some "tweaks" to .NET 2.0 framework to>
> avoid> > > some> > compatibility issues with the .NET 3.0 APIs.> >> >
> Quoting Scott> > > Nonnenburg who left this comment on one of my blog
> posts:> > "We've made> > > SP-level fixes to .NET 2.0 components, doing
> our best to avoid> >> breaking> > > changes."> >> > Perhaps that
> explains why .NET 2.0 on XP (2.0.50727.42)> is> > > different
> than> .NET 2.0 on Vista (2.0.50727.308)?> > --> Keith> >> > >
> ===================================> This list is hosted by>
> DevelopMentor.> > > http://www.develop.com> > View archives and manage
> your subscription(s)> at> > > http://discuss.develop.com> >
> ===================================> This> > list> > > is hosted by
> DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com> > View archives and> > > manage
> your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com> > >
> ===================================> > > This list is hosted by
> DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com> > >> > > View archives and
> manage your subscription(s) at> > http://discuss.develop.com> > >> > >
> ===================================> > > This list is hosted by
> DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com> > >> > > View archives and
> manage your subscription(s) at> > http://discuss.develop.com> >> >
> ===================================> > This list is hosted by
> DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com> >> > View archives and manage
> your subscription(s) at> http://discuss.develop.com> >> >
> ===================================> > This list is hosted by
> DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com> >> > View archives and manage
> your subscription(s) at> http://discuss.develop.com> >
> ===================================> This list is hosted by
> DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com> > View archives and manage your
> subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com> >
> ===================================> This list is hosted by
> DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com> > View archives and manage your
> subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
> ===================================
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com
> 
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://discuss.develop.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

Reply via email to