Down the road we will have to address the metaphysics (or perhaps discover their is something other than materialism vs. idealism) implied by this early dismantling of of differences dressed as dichotomies - but I'm at the moment more interested in the economy of "seeable and the sayable" that you identify with Ranciere's foray into differentiation - can you elaborate this, because actually I suspect that embedded in this there just might be an argument for the notion that images (as semiotic constructs) constitute indexical signs, rather than mere abstract signifiers Saul Ostrow Visual Arts and Technologies The Cleveland Institute of Art
> From: Alexei Procyshyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:17:02 -0400 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: The Fate of The Image > > For now, the > interesting point for me is how the seeable and the sayable disrupt one > another in the creation of an image. insofar as that's the case, Ranciere > can't be arguing for some theory of non-identity, but for something rather > different.
