On what exactly? The problems of analytic philosophers (including aestheticians) with continental stuff?
It's well known, isn't it? It's why they have separate conferences, journals, power bases etc. Of course the continentals also keep themselves separate from the analytics - though for different reasons. Is that what you meant? There's actually a conference in Australia later this year where people from each camp are going to meet and try to thrash out the differences - at least that's the theory. Sort of Cold War, east-meets-west, summit. DA -Original Message----- From: saul ostrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 31 March 2008 2:47 PM To: [email protected]; Derek Allan Subject: Re: The Fate of The Image Can you elaborate on this Saul Ostrow Visual Arts and Technologies The Cleveland Institute of Art > From: Derek Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:46:13 +1000 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: The Fate of The Image > > As I've said, I do not belong to the analytic school of aesthetics but when > I read things like this I see why they react so strongly against a lot of > continental stuff. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1350 - Release Date: 30/03/2008 12:32 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1350 - Release Date: 30/03/2008 12:32 PM
