Doesn't anyone here agree with me?

Art/literature teachers are always teaching taste - or as A.A. puts it:
"What does the art teacher see?  The pupil's mistakes"

Even if they deny it - even if it's a taste for certain certain theories
instead of certain kinds of images - and even if all they're teaching is a
tolerance or relaxation  rather then a refinement of discrimination.

When Brady's professor tells the fourth year student: "The hands you painted
look like flippers" - he teaching a taste for hands that look like hands.
(apparently an important issue here on A-L -- as expressed in the recent
dismay over the hands and feet of Gr|newald's Christ - and thank God Gr|newald
never learned how to do them right!)

And if Brady's professor is concerned that a viewer "will not be able to
discern a hierarchy by responding to the shapes in the picture." - he's
teaching a taste for such a hierarchy - otherwise, why raise the issue ?

If Boris is teaching his students to "see all the colors or shapes
etc. on the surface of the model" -- he's teaching them that it's
less important to "think apple or flower" than to think "form, color, value"
Why ? because he's teaching a taste for resemblance to nature.(or as Goodman
might say - he teaching a preferred set of codes)

When Tom is writing about how to allow a novel to get written -- doesn't he
have certain ideas about what would make the resulting text   attractive to a
publisher? (i.e. conform to the taste of a current market for such things) ?
Wouldn't the  jacket of his book remind us of such expertise by relating his
success as an editor?

Preferences for images is primarily about taste -- unless those images are
expected to relate information about a specific question that needs to be
answered or job that needs to get done -- as in science or technology.

And our world privileges science/technology above everything else.

Which itself is a judgment of taste -- a  taste for the white coat of the lab
technician -  rather than the elegant weeds of the courtier.

Everyone has to be a scientist -- if not of astrophysics - then of
socio-economics, or neurology, or mass psychology, or -- gasp -- consumer
marketing.

I find it all to be either ludicrous or disgusting -- but then I have
different tastes.

I have a taste for beauty.





_____________________________________________________________
Click here for free information on how to become certified as a project
management professional.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2211/fc/REAK6ZqYFirvMPr9tQcuomX9OMgfKo
Df0jvvb6BjnAKqBMtS59jHXe/

Reply via email to