This is truly funny. "Manet lost it on this design." wc ----- Original Message ---- From: armando baeza <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: armando baeza <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, November 3, 2009 8:51:08 PM Subject: Re: manet
Sorry Chris. Manet, as great as he was. lost it on this design. I think he was not satisfied with this one, yet i love the overall feeling. mando On Nov 3, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Chris Miller wrote: >> Sorry, but this line of thought is above my intellectual capacity of > comprehension. (Boris Shoshensky) > > That was it's intention. > > > But it's only only a commonplace to note that " when certain cues are present > in a image they (i.e. all viewers) fill > in the missing information" > > While Saul's response does not address the recognition of a "central > organizing effect" --- which some viewers (like you, I, and Duve) find in > 'The Bar at the Folies Bergere" , others (like Mando) apparently do not, and > still others (like Saul and William) may find, but consider that issue to be > highly subjective, and just one discourse among many that may be conducted > concerning any painting. > > > > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > > ............................... > > > Sorry, but this line of thought is above my intellectual capacity of > comprehension. > Boris Shoshensky > > > From: Saul Ostrow <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: William Conger <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: manet > Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:56:13 -0500 > > Someone's expectation that when certain cues are present in a image they fill > in the missing information - consequently we see in the case of Manet's > painting perspective where there is single organizing principle - that as > Mando suggests the painting was painted at different times with some > disregard > for what came before - similar to what he had done in Luncheon on the Grass > > > On 11/3/09 10:40 AM, "Boris Shoshensky" <[email protected]> wrote: > > What lies and in which habits? > Boris Shoshensky > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: Saul Ostrow <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: William Conger <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: manet > Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:17:04 -0500 > > And does this lie in the habits of the viewer in the case of Manet > > > On 11/2/09 1:16 PM, "Boris Shoshensky" <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Actually I thought what I had sent along supported Williams observation - by > demonstrating the fact that the space of the painting has no central > organizing principle and that each section or sector has its own logic" > > That each section or sector has its own logic doesn't prevent composition to > have 'bridges' that create central organizing effect, without which painting > would fall apart. > Boris Shoshensky > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > Diet Help > Cheap Diet Help Tips. Click here. > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/c?cp=DyukY8C53vLkKj5f6OczmAAAJz6c > l_zTaptgNR5c8Mer1v9kAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYQAAAAAA=
