Michael's logic, presented in this case, works for me.

Boris Shoshensky

---------- Original Message ----------
From: Michael Brady <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: "What is happening during an 'a.e.'?"
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 22:58:15 -0400

On Apr 2, 2010, at 7:56 PM, William Conger wrote:

> Michael is wrong to  say my example of a tube of red paint validates his
claim that words pre-limit the meanings ascribed to them. A tube of red paint
is not the same as the word red.

That's not what I said, William. I said that words and other artifacts
contain
formal properties that persist and convey the meaning to the other person,
analogously to the qualities in red paint that the other person perceives as
red. The difference is that the red material exists as such, whereas the word
or artifact is made purposefully (or chosen purposefully) so that it can
manifest formal properties that convey (my word) something to the other
person
or cause to be evoked or occasion (Cheerskep's terms) a response by the
other.

I am stuck on the notion that there is a third party in this process of
getting an idea from my head to someone else's, and that third party is the
means of conveyance--very often words, and for the rest of the time some
intentionally made or chosen structure that does the trick. I think it is a
crucial demonstration of this "tertium quid" notion that artifacts can convey
"meaning" across vast distances and ranges of time that stretch beyond the
living cultures of people. We can encounter these old and far-away artifacts
and by dint of hard work elicit some of the "meaning" they are still able to
convey. Now, indeed, there are many cautions and caveats that guard the
careful from overinterpreting or overtranslating these artifacts, but there
are also accepted means of verifying the accuracy of the translations, to
some
stated degree of confidence. Whether or not these ideas only ever exist in
human minds, there is some part of the "meaning" that also exists apart from
the human mind, namely what someone has shaped or formed into the artifact.

Reply via email to