I know I did some consulting to map out the paths where there were licensed 
microwave links years ago. They do consider this in their placement of the 
turbines. I am not sure of their obligation to do so. This may have been a 
local zoning requirement more than anything. 

 

Thank You,

Brian Webster

214 Eggleston Hill Rd.

www.wirelessmapping.com

www.Broadband-Mapping.com

 

From: AF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 11:08 AM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Windfarm in licensed path

 

The FCC license protects against RF interference, not trees or highrise 
buildings or wind turbines.  And there’s nothing Commsearch can do.

 

You are lucky that it’s an FCC licensed path, and I would absolutely approach 
them now in the planning phase.  When the windfarm Mike references was built in 
our area, they voluntarily moved one of the turbines to get it out of the path 
of a licensed backhaul.  They probably won’t do this for an unlicensed path or 
a subscriber link.  Also the phase where they are most likely to make such an 
accommodation is during the planning and approval phase.  Least impact on them 
at that point, and they are motivated to resolve community resistance to their 
project where possible.  I don’t think they are required to accommodate you, so 
I wouldn’t go charging in guns blazing, be nice and hope they are nice back.

 

The towers obviously are more of a problem than the blades, but the blades do 
affect the RF when they pass through the beam, especially if there are multiple 
turbines in the path.  I figure a couple dB blip per turbine but it’s hard to 
predict scientifically.

 

From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 9:43 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Windfarm in licensed path

 

Are you wanting Commscope to go put some C4 on that turbine? :-p


Ken, what did you do when they built that Shabonna\Lee windfarm? I know you had 
some links down there.



-----
Mike Hammett
 <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> Image removed by sender. 
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> Image removed by 
sender. <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> 
Image removed by sender. <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Image removed by sender.
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange
 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> Image removed by sender. 
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> Image removed by 
sender. <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> Image removed by sender.
 <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP
 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> Image removed by sender. 
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> Image removed by 
sender.




  _____  

From: "Steve Jones" <[email protected]>
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 9:39:26 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] Windfarm in licensed path

We have a windfarm going up that was , one of the turbines is dead in the 
middle of an 11ghz link path.  Who do we reach out to for this. We have 
commsearch protection service, I reached out to them, but im not sure thats in 
the protection scope. Im leery of reaching out to the windfarm directly, as 
they may lawyer up before we get our recourse figured out. As I understand it 
they are in the impact study phase still, so i assume that means our window of 
opportunity closes when that is done. 

Any advice?


-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

 

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to