Steve in our area we could do that "on the cheap" with 12 or 24 count cable direct buried for around 100k. There are so many variables though. You really need someone who has done work in that area and is familiar with permitting costs and requirements. I'd it's so rural that you can plow the bulk of it and you are OK with direct bury you can save a ton of money vs putting it all in duct.
Personally I run at least 24 strands on any run that's going "somewhere". Dead end runs can be 12F. On Sat, Dec 22, 2018, 1:46 AM Steve Jones <[email protected] wrote: > If a guy wanted to get fiber in the ground, non aerial between two > buildings to replace an existing licensed 1.3 gb link. Crosses 3 > creek/ditches, 10 rural intersections, 10 rural town blocks. What would be > needed? > I would guess that duct is the best thing to put it in, innerduct being > better. > I'd guess 96+ count isn't going to cost any more per strand to put in the > duct than 2 (not the cost of the fiber itself) > Lots of dark strands and duct space is probably lucrative to have just in > case. > Slack, handholes, vaults, etc, what would you put in there? 10 or so > customers on the path so not a ftth type thing. > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
