EP S16 can also supply 48V.  We use it to power ePMP 2K sectors @ 48V on
lots of sites.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:45 AM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:

> And yes the 3000L is made for 24V power supplies.  This turns out to be
> convenient if you want to power them with a Ubiquiti Edgepoint S16.  Which
> I do.  Or did.  Now I want to power them with .30-06 bullets.
>
>
> On 1/23/2020 12:33 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> I think I would have noticed it.....but I'll look at it tomorrow when I
> get to the office.  I will send a pic as proof of the existence or
> nonexistence of an SFP on the actual 3000L.  Currently it is Schrodinger's
> SFP.
>
>
> On 1/22/2020 9:18 PM, Josh Baird wrote:
>
> Where?  It says it has a 100/1000BaseT ethernet interface:
>
>
> https://cdn.cambiumnetworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/SS_ePMP_3000L_11182019.pdf
>
>
> Erm - it also says it only accepts 29V PoE.  The ePMP 3000 (non-L)
> supports 56V.  Did they really make the ePMP3kL only support 24-29V?  If
> so, that is pretty dumb.
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 9:13 PM Ryan Ray <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Spec sheet says 3000L has an sfp.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 4:24 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The 3000 has an SFP, the 3000L does not.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:54 PM Ryan Ray <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It’s got an sfp in it
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 1:57 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Copper.  3000L doesn't have fiber.
>>>>> On 1/22/2020 4:55 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you seeing Ethernet problems with fiber connections as well, or
>>>>> just the copper?  We put up an EPMP 3000 early last year.  It had Ethernet
>>>>> problems for about the first 3 or 4 weeks of putting it up, but has seemed
>>>>> fine since then.  This was on Copper connection.  I was just having
>>>>> Ethernet problems in general, 1g, 100m, 10m.  It would instantly negotiate
>>>>> the speed, but have lots of packet loss.  I attributed it to corrosion on
>>>>> the Cat5 pins that summer temperature fluctuations cleared up.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/22/2020 2:45 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It was 1 link at 0.9 mile on a +30 EIRP DFS band.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just a test.  Test failed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/22/2020 3:41 PM, Ryan Ray wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Technically you wouldn't see any performance gains over a 2000 unless
>>>>> you're hitting 256qam.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the distance of the links?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:19 AM Matt Hoppes <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No but Chris and I had a theory it was hot heat related... that kills
>>>>>> that theory.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/22/20 1:17 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>>>> > Binghamton, NY just north of you.  Usually in the 30's this time of
>>>>>> > year, but it's been more like in the teens for several days.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Did you see a temperature correlation?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On 1/22/2020 12:49 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>>>>> >> I purchased a bunch of ePMP3000 (not L) and have honestly had
>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>> >> but issues with them since trying to deploy... including multiple
>>>>>> >> instances at multiple sites with the inability to get Gig to
>>>>>> link...
>>>>>> >> but at the office it's fine... swap to a Ubiquiti AC radio and
>>>>>> it's a
>>>>>> >> Gig on the tower.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Out of curiosity what temperature are you at wherever you are
>>>>>> right now?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On 1/22/20 12:46 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>>>> >>> On the first unit we tried yeah.  GigE worked in the office, but
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> >>> the tower it would only run at 100BaseT.  Our guys fought with it
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> >>> a couple of days. Brought it back to the office and it did a gig
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> >>> the office no problem.  I assume it's related to the cable
>>>>>> length,
>>>>>> >>> but maybe some other factor matters.  The switch at the tower was
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> >>> Mikrotik CRS 2xx of some type.  Not sure if that matters.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> In any case, the second unit we plugged in at the tower went
>>>>>> right to
>>>>>> >>> a gig no problem.....except that one died today after being in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> >>> air for 4 days.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Maybe I just rolled snake eyes or something, but it has me
>>>>>> wondering
>>>>>> >>> about reliability.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> The price and feature set is right so I had big plans for these.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> >>> probably won't try them again unless something changes.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> -Adam
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> On 1/22/2020 12:39 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>>>>> >>>> WAIT WAIT WAIT.... You ALSO are having issues linking at
>>>>>> Gigabit?
>>>>>> >>>> That's interesting, because myself and someone else are also
>>>>>> having
>>>>>> >>>> this issue and Cambium has sworn until they are blue in the face
>>>>>> >>>> there is no issue.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> On 1/22/20 11:54 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>> So I tried an ePMP 3000L.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> Real world performance is ultimately about the same as ePMP
>>>>>> 2000.
>>>>>> >>>>> QoS doesn't work properly.  SM was re registering with a pretty
>>>>>> >>>>> minimal amount of noise.  I had 27 DL SNR and 17 UL SNR on a
>>>>>> DFS
>>>>>> >>>>> band......it's not going to get a lot better than that where I
>>>>>> am.
>>>>>> >>>>> Not in real life anyway.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> First AP wouldn't link at 1Gig on a long cable (but would on a
>>>>>> >>>>> short cable).  Tried a second AP and that one worked at 1Gig,
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> >>>>> then died 4 days later.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> I got a lot of mileage out of the ePMP 2000 and the PMP450, but
>>>>>> >>>>> this new product does not currently impress.   It's sort of a
>>>>>> >>>>> little bit shitty in fact.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> Maybe they'll bake out some of the issues later.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to