Like i said..

On Sat, Jul 24, 2021, 5:56 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Getting vaccinated is just the correct thing to do...like polio and other
> ones..
> I don't see it as an infringement on my rights at all.
> Families are dying in the south mostly...the virus doesn't give a shit
> what you believe...
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2021, 4:38 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've been trying to stay out of this to avoid stirring this up further,
>> but, it's probably time for me to stick my $0.02 in...
>>
>> One primary role of government is to make rules or laws in places where
>> people's rights (or opinions) come in conflict with each other.
>>
>> Pre-vaccine, the most likely way for me to be protected from infection is
>> if other people behaved like they might be a carrier.   That is, limit
>> social interaction, stay away from other people if possible, wear masks,
>> practice good hygiene.   Some people didn't want to do this.  Other people
>> didn't want to be infected, but couldn't protect themselves effectively.
>>  Both sides had rights - the right to do what one wants vs the right not to
>> be infected by others who are a carrier.  Add to that the right of being
>> able to have an ICU bed available if you did end up infected.   At this
>> point, the government needed to step in and make a decision about who's
>> rights were going to be protected, and because of the nature of COVID, most
>> places ended up choosing the rights of people not to be infected.
>>
>> Post-vaccine this conversation changes.   Now I  have a way to protect
>> myself.   Post-vaccination, my risk of dying or having long-term effects
>> from COVID is more like dying from the flu (if not less).   As a result,
>> now that anyone who wants a shot can get one, I really could care less
>> whether someone else wears a mask or gets vaccinated.  Your choice.  And
>> the government rules should reflect that, which most of them do at this
>> point.
>>
>> There is one main caveat, and that is that in some areas we're going to
>> have a resurgence of COVID among (mostly) the unvaccinated.    If
>> unvaccinated people start to fill the hospital ICU wards, then either we
>> need to go back to mask mandates and similar in those areas, OR we need to
>> be willing to kick unvaccinated people out of the ICU when they fill, and
>> let them die of COVID at home.   Yes, this is cold, but if you chose a path
>> that results in a higher risk of dying, then you should also take the risk
>> of there not being an ICU bed available to you if you need it.
>>
>> There is also the concern about variants being generated by the virus
>> continuing to run rampant among parts of the population.  I'm going to
>> ignore this as this makes my point a bit more messy as then you have to
>> start asking difficult questions about what the actual risk of this is
>> versus the downside of forcing a population to either be vaccinated or
>> continue quarantine+mask wearing.   I'm not convinced that there is strong
>> enough evidence, either way, to make a decision here.
>>
>> The other point which continues to be frustrating is that we need people
>> to make their decision about being vaccinated based on actual facts.   Not
>> based on talking points or conspiracy theories from the left or the right.
>>  The vaccine isn't magnetic.  The vaccine, although still not fully FDA
>> approved has proven to have a lower statistical risk of bad outcomes than
>> COVID itself.  No, the vaccine isn't 100% effective, but it is highly
>> effective.   No, the vaccines don't have tracking chips.   Even if you
>> survive COVID-19 (99% chance of doing so), the likelihood of having
>> long-term health effects is much higher (over 10%).   No, the vaccines
>> don't alter your DNA.   And on and on.
>>
>> Sadly, it seems that the worst of these conspiracy theories around the
>> vaccine and COVID continue to come from the right.  I totally respect
>> people who look at the real facts and decide not to get the vaccine.   I
>> can understand how two people who look at the facts can choose either way,
>> although I do believe that with the real facts, most people would end up
>> with the vaccine.   But the whole slew of made-up crap that is circulating
>> is detrimental to people actually being able to make an informed decision
>> as opposed to jumping on this or that conspiracy theory and making
>> decisions based on that.  Add to that a healthy dose of ignoring facts that
>> don't match up with one's world view and you've got a situation where many
>> people make decisions based not on facts but on rumors and suppositions.
>>
>> And before someone thinks I'm saying the right has an exclusive lock on
>> conspiracy theories, I need to state for the record that the left has their
>> fair share as well.   Which side has made up more crap seems to revolve
>> around the issue, with some issues largely just being both sides making up
>> crap to make the issue appear larger than it is.
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 7:13 AM David Coudron <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> This is the key to the issue.   Who decides what a valid medical reason
>>> is.    In this country, we have always allowed an individual to discuss and
>>> evaluate medical treatments with their doctor and their family and then
>>> make their own decision.  The individual’s determination of necessity for a
>>> medical treatment may vary from person to person.   Their perception of
>>> risk of treatment versus reward of not getting sick is not the same for
>>> every instance.    Most people are pretty smart and will make decision in
>>> the best interest of their situation.   Are we now saying that the
>>> individual can no longer make this determination?   That people are not
>>> smart enough to make the decision in their best interest?    That someone
>>> on an email list knows better than each individual whether or not that
>>> individual should be taking any medical treatment including a
>>> vaccination?   I hope we are not moving into an era in the country where
>>> people decide for others whether or not they should take any medical
>>> treatment, especially when we are talking about an experimental vaccine.
>>> If we are suggesting that the group can now make decisions for mandatory
>>> medical procedures, that is a pretty slippery slope.   I believe in the
>>> good of people and their ability to make a good decision when they have
>>> enough facts.   I suspect most unvaccinated folks will eventually have
>>> enough data to determine they are ready to be vaccinated.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Again, and I can’t say this enough, if a person is vaccinated and they
>>> believe the vaccine works, why are they concerned that others are not
>>> vaccinated.   The only people at risk are those who have decided not to be
>>> vaccinated and they have accepted that risk.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of * Robert
>>> *Sent:* Friday, July 23, 2021 8:53 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David,
>>>     Do you have any research of the percentage of people who "have a
>>> valid medical reason" for not taking the vaccine?   I don't imagine it's
>>> anywhere near the 45% of the US population the is refusing that are not
>>> below the current age limit.   I would WAG that it's probably a lot less
>>> than the 20% number not taking it that would get us to effective herd
>>> immunity.
>>>
>>> Now the kids are getting it and that we don't have a solution for.
>>>
>>> On 7/23/21 4:20 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:
>>>
>>> AIDS was / Is 100% avoidable.  COVID is like someone with AIDS spraying
>>> you down with their precious bodily fluids by sneezing.  People have been
>>> prosecuted for infecting others with AIDS.  Why not COVID?  If you don’t
>>> want the vax, fine but you need a full body condom if you come within 100’
>>> of another person.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 23, 2021, at 4:24 PM, David Coudron
>>> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> There are valid reasons for deciding to take this vaccine, the shingles
>>> vaccine, the flu vaccine, or a myriad of other medications.   Each decision
>>> should be based on risk/reward of that drug and the medical condition being
>>> treated.   To think that you know everyone’s medical situation better than
>>> they do doesn’t seem very feasible and awfully presumptive.   To call them
>>> selfish for making a decision they believe is in their best medical
>>> interest seems overly judgmental.     Yes, there are people are deciding
>>> not to take it simply because they think they shouldn’t be forced to take a
>>> medical treatment against their will.   You may feel that we should force
>>> them to take the treatment for the better good.   I doubt you would feel
>>> the same about mandatory castration of young men to curb overcrowding of
>>> the earth.   Obviously there is a line somewhere about forced treatment for
>>> the greater good.  I am not attempting to determine where that line is,
>>> only suggesting that folks have valid medical reasons for not deciding to
>>> take the vaccine and they shouldn’t be publicly shamed for making that
>>> decision.   It doesn’t seem that far fetched, but I am learning I see
>>> things differently than some other folks.   So be it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I love the argument that we have to get vaccinated, but we still have to
>>> act like the vaccine doesn’t work in order to save the human race.   Seems
>>> like a disconnect there.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If we were really so worried about infecting others or causing harm to
>>> others, we would avoid all other activities that create risk for others.
>>> We’d never drive a car, much less have a beer and get in a car.   I doubt
>>> that very many of us on this list can say that.  We would never allow the
>>> sale of fatty foods.   We would force each and everyone to get to a body
>>> mass within our accepted range.   Keep in mind life is risky.   We don’t
>>> need to do stupid things, but being alive carries with it the risk of
>>> dying.    We are all much more likely to die of heart disease, stroke
>>> related illness, or cancer than we are of Covid.   Those are just the
>>> facts.  Many folks make small adjustments to reduce the risk of those
>>> likely causes of mortality, but have long ago passed on decisions to make
>>> big changes to eliminate the possibility of those causes of death.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have long ago decided not to live in constant fear of these things.
>>> While I chose to be vaccinated, I respect the right of folks to make the
>>> best choice for their situation.   I also respect the right of someone who
>>> is not in the best physical condition to eat a steak.   I realize that a
>>> drunk driver might kill me some day, but I respect the right of individuals
>>> to go to a bar and expect that most (but not all) are responsible enough
>>> not to drink and drive when they have had too much.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Keep in mind that this virus would have never come to our country if we
>>> never allowed anyone in or out of it.   But we understand that certain
>>> personal freedoms are worth the possibility of catching a disease that
>>> might kill us.   I have a tough time with the mass hypochondria surrounding
>>> this situation.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, I am not meaning to make anyone mad, just trying to keep
>>> perspective.     I just don’t understand why folks get so bent out of shape
>>> if they are already vaccinated.   I guess they don’t believe the vaccine
>>> will work because if it does, there is nothing to worry about.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I wager that given Covid’s relation to influenza like viruses, that it
>>> is with us permanently.   We will have yearly updates to the vaccination,
>>> but we’ll never be rid of it.   Not because people aren’t getting
>>> vaccinated, but because it will always mutate ahead of the vaccine, just
>>> like the flu virus.   Please don’t take this as an argument to not work on
>>> vaccines, we absolutely should as it will save lives.   But as Carl pointed
>>> out below, vaccines aren’t 100% effective……. 😊
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I will lay a friendly wager down.  Remember, we had a AIDS epidemic
>>> several years ago.   Did we force people to stop having sex or many of the
>>> other high risk things that led to AIDS?   Does anyone even talk about AIDS
>>> anymore?   32 million people died of AIDS and people still die from it.
>>> No one talks about it any more.  Covid will be the same way in 10 years.
>>> That is my bet.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Again, lots of stuff to poke holes in here I am sure.   My only original
>>> point was that there are valid reasons folks chose not to get vaccinated.
>>> We can’t and shouldn’t know what they are, but should respect their right
>>> to chose.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> <[email protected]> *On
>>> Behalf Of *Carl Peterson
>>> *Sent:* Friday, July3, 2021 4:30 PM
>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No vaccination is 100% effective.  From a public policy perspective, you
>>> need to pull on the levers that work in order to get R0 to be less than 1.
>>> We know that a good percentage of people will follow a mask mandate.  Even
>>> if most of that group is vaccinated that lever will still do something
>>> since no vaccine is 100% effective and some number of that population is
>>> walking around as symptom-free carriers at any given time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Getting most people vaccinated would be the best way to lower R0, but if
>>> someone is too self centered to care about their neighbors or their country
>>> there isn't much you can do to make them care.  That lever isn't doing much
>>> these days.  The issue here really is about what is best for society vs
>>> what an individual thinks is best for themselves.  An individual's personal
>>> risk of having serious Covid complications is pretty low so if
>>> they believe there is some risk to the vaccine and don't account for
>>> externalities, e.g. them infecting other people, then it's hard to convince
>>> them to get vaccinated.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 4:05 PM Dennis Burgess <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why does someone who has made an informed choice not to get vaxxed by a
>>> NON-FDA approved drug have not sit out in timeout?  This is a free society,
>>> if you are so scared, you stay home. I will take my chances.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *<image001.png>*
>>>
>>> *Dennis Burgess*
>>>
>>>
>>> Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
>>>
>>> *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
>>>
>>> *Office*: 314-735-0270  Website: http://www.linktechs.net
>>>
>>> Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com
>>>
>>> Need MikroTik Cloud Management: https://cloud.linktechs.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Jan-GAMs
>>> *Sent:* Friday, July 23, 2021 3:32 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There is no having a sane discussion on this topic.  This is more like a
>>> whining child having an open temper-tantrum in public.  Un-vaxxed persons
>>> are a health hazard and attempting to explain this to a child is a bit
>>> difficult.  Those who don't have a vaccine should not be allowed in
>>> public.  Every time a non-vaxxed person gets sick with Covid there is the
>>> potential for a new variant even worse than the Delta variant.  Un-vaxxed
>>> persons should be quarrantined as they are a health-hazard to everyone
>>> around them and to the public at large.
>>>
>>> On 7/23/21 1:11 PM, David Coudron wrote:
>>>
>>> I know, we can all make our own decisions.   However, I don’t believe I
>>> have stated anything that varies from the facts.   I can send you the
>>> Moderna sheet I received with my vaccine if you want to see that.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Your points about FDA approval are probably accurate, however, why is
>>> not OK to say that I want to wait for the approval?   That doesn’t seem so
>>> unreasonable.  We don’t let folks on the plane based on the likelihood that
>>> those on the no-fly list probably won’t show up to get on the plane
>>> anyway.   We still check each and every person to make sure.  Just like we
>>> do the FDA approval process to make sure.   Otherwise, we could just tell
>>> drug companies “if you are pretty sure you’d pass anyway, we won’t bother
>>> putting you through the approval process”   We don’t do that for good
>>> reason.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree with you on the memes both ways.   Neither approach are helping
>>> the situation.   It should be a discussion based upon the scientific merits
>>> of the situation.   Unfortunately both side love to poke at the
>>> intelligence of those that don’t agree with their decision.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There is no way to know this for sure, but I wonder how many folks
>>> publicly shaming others for not taking the vaccine know that it is not FDA
>>> approved?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Likely won’t change lots of folks decisions, nor am I suggesting it
>>> should have.   But I don’t think that those of us that decided to go ahead
>>> with the vaccination get to make medical decisions for those who aren’t
>>> comfortable with an experimental vaccine.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> <[email protected]> *On
>>> Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
>>> *Sent:* Friday, July 23, 2021 2:56 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT somewhat political
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not calling anybody stupid, but I don't agree with most of your list.
>>>
>>> On 7/23/2021 3:37 PM, David Coudron wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is what I find particularly challenging about suggesting that folks
>>> who have chosen not to take the vaccine are not that smart.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. Folks who do that never talk about that fact that this is not an
>>>    FDA approved medicine/vaccine.   I took the Moderna vaccine, the 
>>> paperwork
>>>    clearly stated several facts.  Among them are:
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. This is not FDA approved.
>>>
>>> It has an emergency use authorization.  FDA approval takes a long time,
>>> but around 90% of the submissions end up approved because they are pretty
>>> well tested by the manufacturer before they apply.  Anybody applying for
>>> FDA approval already has a pretty good idea whether it's going to go
>>> through or not.  Presumably people on a no-fly list don't routinely show up
>>> at the airport expecting to board a plane.  Presumably people don't try to
>>> get a CDL if they know they'll fail the drug test.  Same idea.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1.
>>>       2. This “vaccine” has not been proven to prevent the virus.
>>>       While we likely all agree that there is a very good likelihood that 
>>> this
>>>       “vaccine” will help prevent it, it is far from a proven fact.
>>>
>>> 99% of people dying of Covid right now are un-vaccinated.  We can split
>>> hairs and say maybe it didn't prevent them from becoming infected, but it
>>> clearly prevents them from dying.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1.
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. The argument is, “there should be no reason to think this vaccine
>>>    isn’t safe since people aren’t dying from taking the vaccine”.
>>>
>>> I've never heard such an argument.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1.   Vaccines are a risk/reward type of medical treatment.   Every
>>>    medicine you take has some level of side effect.   The vast majority of
>>>    medicines have such negligible side effects, that they are considered
>>>    completely safe.   The FDA approval process exists to ensure we 
>>> understand
>>>    the potential of serious side effects and drug interaction issues.   If 
>>> you
>>>    are 30 years old and folks are saying you have to take this experimental
>>>    drug to prevent this incredibly small chance of you becoming seriously 
>>> ill
>>>    or dying, it seems like an intelligent thing to say “I am not sure the 
>>> risk
>>>    of getting seriously ill or dying from this disease outweighs the risk of
>>>    using an experimental drug”.   It used to be that people relied upon a
>>>    conversation with their doctor to determine personal risk of disease and
>>>    use of a drug.    Apparently we no longer do that.   We publicly shame
>>>    people into using experimental drugs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. Since it is not FDA approved, we don’t have a full understanding
>>>    of drug interactions with other medicines folks need to take.
>>>
>>> It isn't some weird new chemical we just invented this year.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. We likely understand the very common medicines, but, certainly
>>>    not all.   We have FDA approval processes for good reason.   If for
>>>    example, you were under 40 and were taking seizure control medication, it
>>>    would be very fair to hold off on an experimental drug until it is fully
>>>    understood if the vaccine might lessen the effectiveness of the seizure
>>>    control medication.   An incredibly low risk of serious illness or death
>>>    from the virus could turn into a good chance of serious injury from
>>>    seizure.   As far as I know data like that is certainly not available
>>>    yet.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. Why do vaccinated people feel the need to belittle those that
>>>    have decided not to get vaccinated by an experimental drug?
>>>
>>> I don't know the answer to that.  I'm not comfortable with that behavior
>>> either.  It goes both ways though.  Plenty of memes out there accusing
>>> people of being dumb sheep for taking the vaccine.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> - Forrest
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to