The line between aiding and killing can be incredibly thin to a soldier..  That is why there is a posse comitas provision.   But ICE isn't  subject to it.

On 10/23/25 7:57 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

I remembered a Coast Guard officer being put in charge of the Hurricane Katrina situation, so I did a little searching online to refresh my memory.  Some of that situation seems relevant today.

If that’s before your time or you have forgotten, look up Coast Guard former Admiral Thad Allen and Army former Lt. General Russell Honore.  By all accounts they did excellent work leading that effort, taking over from the botched effort of FEMA political appointee Michael Brown.

The politicians (of both parties) both local and federal didn’t exactly distinguish themselves either.  There was talk of invoking the Insurrection Act, federalizing the Louisiana National Guard, and shooting looters and snipers.  Google AI Overview tells me:

In the chaotic aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, General Russell Honoré ordered soldiers to "put those damn weapons down" after witnessing them pointing guns at civilians in New Orleans. His command, given to emphasize that the victims were not the enemy and were in need of rescue, helped to de-escalate the tense situation and refocus the military on life-saving efforts.

  * *The situation:*

In the days after Hurricane Katrina, some soldiers had their weapons raised and pointed at civilians in New Orleans.

  * *Honoré's response:*

Upon his arrival, Lieutenant General Russell Honoré famously barked at the troops, "Put those damn weapons down! I'm not going to tell you again, goddamn it!".

  * *The reasoning:*

He made it clear that the people were not the enemy, but rather Americans in need of help. He recognized that the troops were not in a combat zone and needed to shift their focus to rescue operations.

  * *The impact:*

This directive helped establish a more effective and humane response, shifting the focus from potential threats to actual life-saving and the delivery of aid. It helped build trust with the victims and was a critical factor in restoring order and carrying out the mission.

*From:*AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Mark Radabaugh
*Sent:* Thursday, October 23, 2025 7:57 AM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the Pacific

Someday I would really like to be able to sail around the Caribbean and South America without having to worry about being randomly blown out of the water for no reason at all.   “Well, the US said it was OK to kill people in international waters”.

Mark



    On Oct 23, 2025, at 1:31 AM, Jason McKemie
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    It seems very telling that when they blew up a boat and people
    survived, they sent them back to their home country vs prosecuting
    them. You can't introduce that testimony into the public record.

    On Wed, Oct 22, 2025, 11:44 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

        Replying to myself, which is perhaps a sign I should be in
        therapy, but I just realized one reason why the Coast Guard is
        underappreciated or at least unknown compared to Army, Navy,
        Air Force and Marines.  They are part of DHS not DOD.

        But now that DOD is calling itself the Department of War,
        maybe DHS is just fine.  Although one is Hegseth and the other
        is Noem, so flip a coin.

        Coast Guard is also much smaller, has a smaller budget, and a
        much smaller PR budget.  No money to toot their own horn.

        *From:*AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof
        *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2025 10:50 PM
        *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the Pacific

        Yeah, but if it’s on the ocean, I’d prefer to see a Hawaii
        Five 0 style chase.  With McGarrett in a speedboat, and at the
        end he says “book ‘em, Danno”.

        Besides, I think the Coasties are an underappreciated branch
        of the US military.

        *From:*AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
        *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2025 8:31 PM
        *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the Pacific

        I prefer to see cartels bombed. When they started moving the
        fent, they chose bombs. A little nose candy here and there,
        some dope, a little crystal, even some heroin was manageable.
        But these ducks decided to move shit that one mistake kills.
        Fuckbag dealers are putting it it club drugs and on vicodins.
        Kids don't have a chance to make a mistake.

        Bomb the shit out of them. Sink their boats, cut their life
        jackets, chum the waters, I don't care as long as they die.
        They don't want to give our kids a second chance, their adults
        deserve as terrible a death as possible. Idgaf about human
        rights, they don't, and I have no interest in the high road.

        On Wed, Oct 22, 2025, 6:45 PM Dev <[email protected]> wrote:

            Turns out drug dealers sometimes get shot, who knew? Maybe
            they were delivering critical supplies to orphanages,
            because speedboats with three engines mean urgent care is
            being delivered expeditiously?

                On Oct 22, 2025, at 3:03 PM, Ken Hohhof
                <[email protected]> wrote:

                Article on the latest generation of US Coast Guard
                “Over The Horizon” boats.

                
https://www.workboat.com/shipbuilding/test-driving-the-coast-guard-s-new-over-the-horizon-cutter-boat

                Generally deployed from a ramp on the back of a larger
                cutter along with helicopters. These things vaguely
                remind me of the WWII PT boats.

                I would not want to try and outrun the Coast Guard.

                *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of
                *Adam Moffett
                *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2025 4:24 PM
                *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected]>
                *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in
                the Pacific

                Yes, and that's the primary argument against this
                practice.  If we have solid intel that they're
                carrying drugs, and we know where they are, then as
                soon as they enter our territorial waters we can board
                the boat and arrest them.  The Coast Guard doesn't
                need a warrant or even a specific reason to board a
                boat.  Some of those boats are faster than Cutters,
                but I don't have solid info on how often they actually
                escape when they're already being tracked.  It's hard
                to imagine they really get away often because the
                Coast Guard also has helicopters, and they're allowed
                to continue a pursuit into international waters (and
                onto land) as long as the pursuit started in US waters.

                Regardless of how often they really get away, it's not
                normal to blow up someone's boat as a law enforcement
                action.  We also don't execute drug traffickers, and
                even when the state executes someone there's a trial
                first.

                but.....

                  * post-911 we treat foreign terrorist organizations
                    as enemy combatants

                  * the executive branch gets to decide who counts as
                    an FTO.  The sec of state, sec of treasury, and
                    attorney general all have to agree, but they also
                    all have the same boss.

                  * Nobody can really stop the executive branch from
                    declaring an FTO.

                      o Congress could pass a bill to override
                        someone's listing as an FTO, but to date
                        they've never done it.

                      o The courts could overturn an FTO listing, but
                        for a lot of reasons it's almost impossible.

                So effectively the President and/or their cabinet has
                a completely legal pathway to authorize military force
                against just about anyone, and there's very little
                anyone can do about it. It's not that I have sympathy
                for drug smugglers, it's that all we can do is take
                someone's word for it that it was a drug smuggler.  If
                anyone is totally comfortable with that then I'm
                curious what your rationale is.

                
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                *From:* AF <[email protected]> on behalf of Ken
                Hohhof <[email protected]>
                *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2025 3:00 PM
                *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected]>
                *Subject:* [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the
                Pacific

                _https://x.com/SecWar/status/1981049943306752361
                <https://x.com/SecWar/status/1981049943306752361>_

                I thought the Coast Guard was able to intercept boats
                and board them, arrest people and confiscate cargo.  I
                seem to remember they specifically acquired high speed
                boats that were a match for anything a drug runner
                might have.

-- AF mailing list
                [email protected]
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
            [email protected]
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to