So that American flag on the back is going to protect me from the various other 
countries that decide to even up the score?    


> On Oct 23, 2025, at 9:10 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Stop smuggling and you will be just fine….
>  
> From: AF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2025 6:57 AM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the Pacific
>  
> Someday I would really like to be able to sail around the Caribbean and South 
> America without having to worry about being randomly blown out of the water 
> for no reason at all.   “Well, the US said it was OK to kill people in 
> international waters”.
>  
> Mark
> 
> 
>> On Oct 23, 2025, at 1:31 AM, Jason McKemie <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>  
>> It seems very telling that when they blew up a boat and people survived, 
>> they sent them back to their home country vs prosecuting them. You can't 
>> introduce that testimony into the public record.
>>  
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025, 11:44 PM Ken Hohhof <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> Replying to myself, which is perhaps a sign I should be in therapy, but I 
>>> just realized one reason why the Coast Guard is underappreciated or at 
>>> least unknown compared to Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines.  They are part 
>>> of DHS not DOD.
>>>  
>>> But now that DOD is calling itself the Department of War, maybe DHS is just 
>>> fine.  Although one is Hegseth and the other is Noem, so flip a coin.
>>>  
>>> Coast Guard is also much smaller, has a smaller budget, and a much smaller 
>>> PR budget.  No money to toot their own horn.
>>>  
>>> From: AF <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> On 
>>> Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 10:50 PM
>>> To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the Pacific
>>>  
>>> Yeah, but if it’s on the ocean, I’d prefer to see a Hawaii Five 0 style 
>>> chase.  With McGarrett in a speedboat, and at the end he says “book ‘em, 
>>> Danno”.
>>>  
>>> Besides, I think the Coasties are an underappreciated branch of the US 
>>> military.
>>>  
>>> From: AF <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> On 
>>> Behalf Of Steve Jones
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 8:31 PM
>>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the Pacific
>>>  
>>> I prefer to see cartels bombed. When they started moving the fent, they 
>>> chose bombs. A little nose candy here and there, some dope, a little 
>>> crystal, even some heroin was manageable. But these ducks decided to move 
>>> shit that one mistake kills. Fuckbag dealers are putting it it club drugs 
>>> and on vicodins.  Kids don't have a chance to make a mistake.
>>>  
>>> Bomb the shit out of them. Sink their boats, cut their life jackets, chum 
>>> the waters, I don't care as long as they die. They don't want to give our 
>>> kids a second chance, their adults deserve as terrible a death as possible. 
>>> Idgaf about human rights, they don't, and I have no interest in the high 
>>> road.
>>>  
>>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025, 6:45 PM Dev <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> Turns out drug dealers sometimes get shot, who knew? Maybe they were 
>>>> delivering critical supplies to orphanages, because speedboats with three 
>>>> engines mean urgent care is being delivered expeditiously?
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 22, 2025, at 3:03 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>  
>>>>> Article on the latest generation of US Coast Guard “Over The Horizon” 
>>>>> boats.
>>>>> https://www.workboat.com/shipbuilding/test-driving-the-coast-guard-s-new-over-the-horizon-cutter-boat
>>>>>  
>>>>> Generally deployed from a ramp on the back of a larger cutter along with 
>>>>> helicopters.  These things vaguely remind me of the WWII PT boats.
>>>>>  
>>>>> I would not want to try and outrun the Coast Guard.
>>>>>  
>>>>> From: AF <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> On 
>>>>> Behalf Of Adam Moffett
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 4:24 PM
>>>>> To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the Pacific
>>>>>  
>>>>> Yes, and that's the primary argument against this practice.  If we have 
>>>>> solid intel that they're carrying drugs, and we know where they are, then 
>>>>> as soon as they enter our territorial waters we can board the boat and 
>>>>> arrest them.  The Coast Guard doesn't need a warrant or even a specific 
>>>>> reason to board a boat.  Some of those boats are faster than Cutters, but 
>>>>> I don't have solid info on how often they actually escape when they're 
>>>>> already being tracked.  It's hard to imagine they really get away often 
>>>>> because the Coast Guard also has helicopters, and they're allowed to 
>>>>> continue a pursuit into international waters (and onto land) as long as 
>>>>> the pursuit started in US waters.
>>>>>  
>>>>> Regardless of how often they really get away, it's not normal to blow up 
>>>>> someone's boat as a law enforcement action.  We also don't execute drug 
>>>>> traffickers, and even when the state executes someone there's a trial 
>>>>> first.  
>>>>>  
>>>>> but..... 
>>>>> post-911 we treat foreign terrorist organizations as enemy combatants
>>>>> the executive branch gets to decide who counts as an FTO.  The sec of 
>>>>> state, sec of treasury, and attorney general all have to agree, but they 
>>>>> also all have the same boss.
>>>>> Nobody can really stop the executive branch from declaring an FTO. 
>>>>> Congress could pass a bill to override someone's listing as an FTO, but 
>>>>> to date they've never done it.  
>>>>> The courts could overturn an FTO listing, but for a lot of reasons it's 
>>>>> almost impossible. 
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>> So effectively the President and/or their cabinet has a completely legal 
>>>>> pathway to authorize military force against just about anyone, and 
>>>>> there's very little anyone can do about it.  It's not that I have 
>>>>> sympathy for drug smugglers, it's that all we can do is take someone's 
>>>>> word for it that it was a drug smuggler.  If anyone is totally 
>>>>> comfortable with that then I'm curious what your rationale is.
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>> From: AF <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on 
>>>>> behalf of Ken Hohhof <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 3:00 PM
>>>>> To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] now we're blowing up boats in the Pacific 
>>>>>  
>>>>> https://x.com/SecWar/status/1981049943306752361
>>>>>  
>>>>> I thought the Coast Guard was able to intercept boats and board them, 
>>>>> arrest people and confiscate cargo.  I seem to remember they specifically 
>>>>> acquired high speed boats that were a match for anything a drug runner 
>>>>> might have.
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> -- 
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>> 
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> 
>  
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to