Oops let's try again. How about this chart...
ubnt radio comparison
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk>
-Ty
On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Try this chart.
On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart
would also have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are
currently approved for. And what power they take.
*From:* Ben Moore <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being
streamlined in the AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam
(still will have multiple sizes).
NanoBeam = all integrated
PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design
It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed
for different areas of the world (i.e. some products are
very popular here and not as popular in other parts of
the world).
Would chart help?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in
some cases need better naming. Like NanoBridge,
NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC, PowerBeam AC. I
honestly don’t understand the difference between a
NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by
antenna gain in dB and the other by antenna size in mm.
And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco?
Because it’s crazy small?
Then there’s the M vs W thing.
My head hurts.
*From:* Ben Moore <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
Here you go:
Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP
PTP - PTP only, airPrism
PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism
These are split due to the filtering used for each
(maximize PTP and PTMP performance). We won't split
unless there is a performance reason to. The cost is
same either way...
How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The current iteractions of the rocket AC line,
these are the only connectorized units?
What are the differences between lite, ptp, and
ptmp airprism only?
Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket
tranzeo link, we already have it connected to one
pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP parabolics.
I figure its worth checking out these AC radios,
but I dont know whats what now, is this a
permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or
is this two things that are going to converge?
Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput
demand link is there any major benefit of going
to the AC over the M5 in terms of performance?
(future demand is a factor as well)
Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies
between the three products there?
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but
you don't see your team as part of yourself you
have already failed as part of the team.
