I have heard 15ish on a netonix port. On March 21, 2015 7:18:58 AM AKDT, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote: >I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption value. The >data sheet is no help except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a POE >injector. That implies a maximum of 24 watts. So less than 24 watts. > >Anyone have one installed that has measured actual power consumption? >If they're running the POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about >12 watts. > >bp ><part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > >On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: >> >> I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the UBNT list >> awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I intend to keep adding to >it >> based on input from the community. >> >> -Ty >> >> On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hot damn! Who made that?!? >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: >>> >>> Oops let's try again. How about this chart... >>> >>> ubnt radio comparison >>> ><https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk> >>> >>> >>> -Ty >>> >>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >wrote: >>> >>> Try this chart. >>> >>> On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart >>> would also have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they >are >>> currently approved for. And what power they take. >>> *From:* Ben Moore <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>> Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being >>> streamlined in the AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam >>> (still will have multiple sizes). >>> NanoBeam = all integrated >>> PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design >>> It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed >>> for different areas of the world (i.e. some products are >>> very popular here and not as popular in other parts of >>> the world). >>> Would chart help? >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in >>> some cases need better naming. Like NanoBridge, >>> NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC, PowerBeam AC. I >>> honestly don’t understand the difference between a >>> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by >>> antenna gain in dB and the other by antenna size in >mm. >>> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? >>> Because it’s crazy small? >>> Then there’s the M vs W thing. >>> My head hurts. >>> *From:* Ben Moore <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>> Here you go: >>> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP >>> PTP - PTP only, airPrism >>> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism >>> These are split due to the filtering used for each >>> (maximize PTP and PTMP performance). We won't split >>> unless there is a performance reason to. The cost >is >>> same either way... >>> How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X? >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy >>> <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, >>> these are the only connectorized units? >>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and >>> ptmp airprism only? >>> Are some of these shipping without all there >guts? >>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket >>> tranzeo link, we already have it connected to >one >>> pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP parabolics. >>> I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, >>> but I dont know whats what now, is this a >>> permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp >or >>> is this two things that are going to converge? >>> Other than the Ac component, for a low >throughput >>> demand link is there any major benefit of going >>> to the AC over the M5 in terms of performance? >>> (future demand is a factor as well) >>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies >>> between the three products there? >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but >>> you don't see your team as part of yourself you >>> have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
