If I remember correctly, ubnt said about 15 watts when they announced the AF5x.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > I have heard 15ish on a netonix port. > > On March 21, 2015 7:18:58 AM AKDT, Bill Prince <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption value. The data >> sheet is no help except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a POE injector. >> That implies a maximum of 24 watts. So less than 24 watts. Anyone have >> one installed that has measured actual power consumption? If they're >> running the POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12 watts. >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> >> On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: >> >> I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the UBNT list >> awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I intend to keep adding to it >> based on input from the community. >> >> -Ty >> On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hot damn! Who made that?!? >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> >>> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: >>> >>> Oops let's try again. How about this chart... >>> ubnt radio comparison >>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk> >>> >>> -Ty >>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Try this chart. >>>> On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would also >>>>> have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently approved for. >>>>> And >>>>> what power they take. >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <[email protected]> >>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>>>> >>>>> Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in the >>>>> AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple sizes). >>>>> >>>>> NanoBeam = all integrated >>>>> PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design >>>>> >>>>> It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for different >>>>> areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular here and not as >>>>> popular in other parts of the world). >>>>> >>>>> Would chart help? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some cases >>>>>> need better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC, >>>>>> PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference between a >>>>>> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in dB and >>>>>> the other by antenna size in mm. >>>>>> >>>>>> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because it’s >>>>>> crazy small? >>>>>> >>>>>> Then there’s the M vs W thing. >>>>>> >>>>>> My head hurts. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <[email protected]> >>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>>>>> >>>>>> Here you go: >>>>>> >>>>>> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP >>>>>> PTP - PTP only, airPrism >>>>>> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism >>>>>> >>>>>> These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize PTP and >>>>>> PTMP performance). We won't split unless there is a performance reason >>>>>> to. The cost is same either way... >>>>>> >>>>>> How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>>>>>> connectorized units? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we already >>>>>>> have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP >>>>>>> parabolics. I >>>>>>> figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont know whats >>>>>>> what >>>>>>> now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp and ptmp or is this >>>>>>> two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of >>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>>> products there? >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>> team. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >
