In 7-10 days, right?? On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I thought it was 24v and a 2amp power supply, so maybe 25 watts? I'll > bust out the amp meter when it finally shows up at my door! > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> If I remember correctly, ubnt said about 15 watts when they announced the >> AF5x. >> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I have heard 15ish on a netonix port. >>> >>> On March 21, 2015 7:18:58 AM AKDT, Bill Prince <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption value. The >>>> data sheet is no help except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a POE >>>> injector. That implies a maximum of 24 watts. So less than 24 watts. >>>> Anyone have one installed that has measured actual power consumption? If >>>> they're running the POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12 >>>> watts. >>>> >>>> bp >>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: >>>> >>>> I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the UBNT list >>>> awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I intend to keep adding to it >>>> based on input from the community. >>>> >>>> -Ty >>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hot damn! Who made that?!? >>>>> >>>>> bp >>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Oops let's try again. How about this chart... >>>>> ubnt radio comparison >>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk> >>>>> >>>>> -Ty >>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Try this chart. >>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would also >>>>>>> have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently approved for. >>>>>>> And >>>>>>> what power they take. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <[email protected]> >>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM >>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in the >>>>>>> AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple sizes). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> NanoBeam = all integrated >>>>>>> PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for >>>>>>> different areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular here >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> not as popular in other parts of the world). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would chart help? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some cases >>>>>>>> need better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC, >>>>>>>> PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference between a >>>>>>>> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in dB >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> the other by antenna size in mm. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because it’s >>>>>>>> crazy small? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then there’s the M vs W thing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My head hurts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM >>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here you go: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP >>>>>>>> PTP - PTP only, airPrism >>>>>>>> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize PTP >>>>>>>> and PTMP performance). We won't split unless there is a performance >>>>>>>> reason >>>>>>>> to. The cost is same either way... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>>>>>>>> connectorized units? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP >>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I >>>>>>>>> dont >>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >>>>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of >>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>>>>> products there? >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>> >> >> >
