I can drive to mine in 10 minutes   so   sas!

Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
wrote:

> That's unfair! but will they be in Ohio in 7-10 days?
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Josh Luthman <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I can drive to my distributor in about 45 minutes if I'm in a hurry.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> until the distributors get them... don't forget to add at least a few
>>> more days.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 6-9 today!!! Hey oh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In 7-10 days, right??
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought it was 24v and a 2amp power supply, so maybe 25 watts?
>>>>>> I'll bust out the amp meter when it finally shows up at my door!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If I remember correctly, ubnt said about 15 watts when they
>>>>>>> announced the AF5x.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have heard 15ish on a netonix port.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On March 21, 2015 7:18:58 AM AKDT, Bill Prince <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption value.
>>>>>>>>> The data sheet is no help except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a 
>>>>>>>>> POE
>>>>>>>>> injector.  That implies a maximum of 24 watts.  So less than 24 watts.
>>>>>>>>> Anyone have one installed that has measured actual power consumption? 
>>>>>>>>>  If
>>>>>>>>> they're running the POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12
>>>>>>>>> watts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the UBNT
>>>>>>>>> list awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I intend to keep adding 
>>>>>>>>> to it
>>>>>>>>> based on input from the community.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Ty
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Hot damn!  Who made that?!?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oops let's try again. How about this chart...
>>>>>>>>>>     ubnt radio comparison
>>>>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Ty
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Try this chart.
>>>>>>>>>>>  On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Yes, charts are always good.  Especially if the chart would
>>>>>>>>>>>> also have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently 
>>>>>>>>>>>> approved
>>>>>>>>>>>> for.  And what power they take.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  *From:* Ben Moore <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Yes, we do have too many variants.  It is being streamlined
>>>>>>>>>>>> in the AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple 
>>>>>>>>>>>> sizes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> NanoBeam = all integrated
>>>>>>>>>>>> PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for
>>>>>>>>>>>> different areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular 
>>>>>>>>>>>> here and
>>>>>>>>>>>> not as popular in other parts of the world).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Would chart help?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases need better naming.  Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NanoBeam
>>>>>>>>>>>>> AC, PowerBeam AC.  I honestly don’t understand the difference 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> between a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in dB and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the other by antenna size in mm.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco?  Because
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it’s crazy small?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then there’s the M vs W thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My head hurts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  *From:* Ben Moore <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Here you go:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PTP - PTP only, airPrism
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PTP and PTMP performance).  We won't split unless there is a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason to.  The cost is same either way...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How much is the budget?  Consider AF-5X?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only connectorized units?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> foot HP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I dont
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ptp and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> three products there?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> team.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to