6-9 today!!! Hey oh
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > In 7-10 days, right?? > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> I thought it was 24v and a 2amp power supply, so maybe 25 watts? I'll >> bust out the amp meter when it finally shows up at my door! >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> If I remember correctly, ubnt said about 15 watts when they announced >>> the AF5x. >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I have heard 15ish on a netonix port. >>>> >>>> On March 21, 2015 7:18:58 AM AKDT, Bill Prince <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption value. The >>>>> data sheet is no help except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a POE >>>>> injector. That implies a maximum of 24 watts. So less than 24 watts. >>>>> Anyone have one installed that has measured actual power consumption? If >>>>> they're running the POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12 >>>>> watts. >>>>> >>>>> bp >>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the UBNT list >>>>> awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I intend to keep adding to it >>>>> based on input from the community. >>>>> >>>>> -Ty >>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hot damn! Who made that?!? >>>>>> >>>>>> bp >>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Oops let's try again. How about this chart... >>>>>> ubnt radio comparison >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk> >>>>>> >>>>>> -Ty >>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Try this chart. >>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would also >>>>>>>> have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently approved for. >>>>>>>> And >>>>>>>> what power they take. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM >>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in >>>>>>>> the AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple sizes). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NanoBeam = all integrated >>>>>>>> PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for >>>>>>>> different areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular here >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> not as popular in other parts of the world). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would chart help? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some cases >>>>>>>>> need better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam >>>>>>>>> AC, >>>>>>>>> PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference between a >>>>>>>>> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in dB >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> the other by antenna size in mm. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because it’s >>>>>>>>> crazy small? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then there’s the M vs W thing. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My head hurts. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM >>>>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here you go: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP >>>>>>>>> PTP - PTP only, airPrism >>>>>>>>> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize PTP >>>>>>>>> and PTMP performance). We won't split unless there is a performance >>>>>>>>> reason >>>>>>>>> to. The cost is same either way... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only >>>>>>>>>> connectorized units? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism >>>>>>>>>> only? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we >>>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP >>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I >>>>>>>>>> dont >>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is >>>>>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of >>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three >>>>>>>>>> products there? >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>>> >>> >>> >> >
