My adapter kits just shipped yesterday from Streakwave, so I am not sure yet. These ones that I sent a picture of are modified feedhorns.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > What about if you use their adapter kit (the one that also converts to > dual slant)? > > I’m guessing my RF Armor radio shields are scrap though? > > > *From:* Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 05, 2015 11:38 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF5 vs AF5X > > > Actually, they will slide right onto the Rocket dish if you only use the > top two pins. > They won't directly bolt on to the old dishes due to the GPS connector > being in the way, but you can use them on any antenna you want. There's > nothing proprietary about them. Just need pigtails and a method of mounting. > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Sam Lambie" <samtaos...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, May 5, 2015 9:38:01 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF5 vs AF5X > > Can the 5x be installed on older Ubnt rocket 30 dbi dishes? or would I > need to install new dishes to accommodate the new radios? > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Yes, you have to use different channels for RX and TX... which can also >> be a significant advantage in some cases. >> >> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >> wrote: >> >>> In Ubiquiti's version of FDD, is it different channel range for the >>> Rx? The risk there is anyone else sees that channel as clear. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On May 4, 2015, at 11:03 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I've been seeing 1-2ms on out AF5x link, not quite as good as an AF5 >>> in FDD, but better than any other synced radio I've seen. >>> >>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:03 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) < >>> geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I have one AF5 up running FDD in the DFS band at 3.4 miles. We didn't >>>> want to try to push an AF24 that far. RTT average is around 0.8ms, so yes, >>>> like a licensed radio. >>>> >>>> No idea about the AF5X, haven't bought any. But I'd guess latency would >>>> be similar to the AF5 or 24 in half-duplex mode, which is going to be like >>>> 4-5ms. I have only done FDD though.. because it's moar better. >>>> >>>> On 5/4/2015 5:53 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>> >>>>> So I assume latency in FDD mode is sub millisecond like a licensed >>>>> backhaul? >>>>> >>>>> What's is latency like on the AF5X? Similar to a PTP600, a few >>>>> milliseconds and very constant? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) >>>>> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 5:48 PM >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF5 vs AF5X >>>>> >>>>> No FDD. Not 48 volt. Not 40+ watts. >>>>> >>>>> On 5/4/2015 5:45 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Can someone point me to a concise explanation somewhere of the >>>>>> difference between AF5 and AF5X? Where you would use each, and what you >>>>>> give up with the X in return for smaller, cheaper, lower power, and >>>>>> drop-in >>>>>> replacement for a Rocket? >>>>>> >>>>>> I know it doesn't have the built-in high isolation TX and RX >>>>>> antennas, and doesn't do a gig of throughput. But I'm sure there's more >>>>>> to >>>>>> it. It's not jumping out at me on the UBNT website. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > -- > *Sam Lambie* > Taosnet Wireless Tech. > 575-758-7598 Office > www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com> > >
