Just looked it up. Only refers to point-to-point mode that antenna gain must be 33dBi and beam width narrower than 3.5 degrees.
Section 15.249 But the limited EIRP makes the band unattractive for PtMP realistically. 60GHz is more likely to happen for small cell backhaul in my opinion. *************************************************************************** Daniel White - Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com <mailto:daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com> Skype: danieldwhite Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84> *************************************************************************** From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 4:33 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution Aren't there antenna beamwidth requirements in 24ghz, or am I remembering that wrong? that would seem to make PtMP kind of impractical. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Daniel White <afmu...@gmail.com <mailto:afmu...@gmail.com> > wrote: I think PtMP is available in 24GHz UL… just there is no vendors for it I am aware of. 38GHz would also work… but I’m not aware of a vendor. There is 24GHz Licensed PtMP gear out there… but its ancient technology and FiberTower is the only spectrum holder I am aware of. 28GHz is probably your only bet. Short range, high cost. But it will hit your capacity requirements. Otherwise you could try 2.5GHz LTE… *************************************************************************** Daniel White - Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 <tel:%2B1%20%28303%29%20746-3590> daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com <mailto:daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com> Skype: danieldwhite Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84> *************************************************************************** From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 4:14 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution I'm pretty sure the FCC doesn't allow PtMP in 24ghz. I don't know if anything exists for PtMP in 80ghz... or maybe 60ghz? It seems like the only real option here is 28ghz. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net <mailto:r...@triadwireless.net> > wrote: You can buy spectrum in 28GHz and use Cambridge like Vivato does or depending on how many clients and range you are talking about, maybe something in 24 or 80GHz. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 2:58 PM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution You know that's why they sync, right? You can have a whole lot of sync'ed APs/masters at the one site and as long as they're transmitting at the same time and the client/slave sites aren't nearing the different master's you'll be fine. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Brett A Mansfield <li...@silverlakeinternet.com <mailto:li...@silverlakeinternet.com> > wrote: That is exactly what I'm looking for. I need something inexpensive comparatively and it needs to be PtMP. I could use airfibers if I could do PTP, but that would be FAR too many radios in one location competing for airtime. Josh, I currently use 3.65, but I need high capacity. 80Mb at best is not near enough. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On May 29, 2015, at 3:44 PM, Daniel White <afmu...@gmail.com <mailto:afmu...@gmail.com> > wrote: You’re looking for licensed PtMP backhaul? If that is the case, then CCS has a 28GHz offering with StraightPath. But not sure what you’re looking at price wise. You may just investigate multiple 23GHz shots or something similar depending on distance. Just want to make sure the request is clear. *************************************************************************** Daniel White - Managing Director SAF North America LLC Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 <tel:%2B1%20%28303%29%20746-3590> daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com <mailto:daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com> Skype: danieldwhite Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84> *************************************************************************** From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:42 PM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution I'm looking for backhaul. Anything in 2.4 or 5GHz won't work. Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On May 29, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: EPMP and maybe Ubnt AC Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 29, 2015 5:32 PM, "Brett A Mansfield" <li...@silverlakeinternet.com <mailto:li...@silverlakeinternet.com> > wrote: I'm looking for the best high capacity and low cost PTMP solution. This is for my backhauls to distribute to smaller cells in a large area. Anyone know of something that fits this description? Thank you, Brett A Mansfield _____ <http://www.avast.com/> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/> _____ <http://www.avast.com/> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/> --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
