60 or 240ghz multipoint, with the massive signal loss due to not using directional antennas, would have a reliable range of say 300ft? May be more reasonable to string fiber, heck cat6 in most cases. On May 29, 2015 5:49 PM, "Brett A Mansfield" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 60 and 240GHz can make wireless in urban areas actually be able to compete > with cable and maybe even fiber. > > Thank you, > Brett A Mansfield > > On May 29, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Brett A Mansfield < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Id stay ahead of the curve. There is a LOT of spectrum out there going > unused. For example, 60GHz and 240GHz. Yes they cannot go very far, but it > seems none of the other high frequency stuff can either. And these are > very high capacity. > > Thank you, > Brett A Mansfield > > On May 29, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe you can explain what you would do different than all the other > manufacturers that would solve the problem. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Brett A Mansfield > *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 3:33 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution > > > > You don't need a lot of money to start manufacturing. You just need to > know the right people. > > Thank you, > > Brett A Mansfield > > > On May 29, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Jason McKemie < > [email protected]> wrote: > > I hope you have a lot more money than most people here... > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Brett A Mansfield < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Yep, it sure does seem that way. I'm trying to think outside of the box, > but every time I do I get back to the same place. Nothing I can do this > with is on the market yet or never will be. I'm getting more and more > tempted every day to start manufacturing my own stuff. I've already started > looking into that. > > > > Anything you guys would like to see come to market? If I go into > manufacturing I'm going to be all in. > > Thank you, > > Brett A Mansfield > > > On May 29, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: > > You need a different strategy. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Brett A Mansfield > *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 3:18 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution > > > > You're very right about the 24GHz. I know several companies are working on > something in 60GHz which would be ideal because it's not a very large area > and can be daisy chained into a ring. 80GHz would be fine, but like you > said nothing seems to exist. These CCS devices look great and might be > exactly what I'm looking for. I just hope the price is right. They are 26 > and 28GHz. But I think Vivint has a bit of a monopoly in my area with all > of their 28GHz radios all over the place. I'm afraid the noise would be too > much, even with the narrow beams. > > Thank you, > > Brett A Mansfield > > > On May 29, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm pretty sure the FCC doesn't allow PtMP in 24ghz. I don't know if > anything exists for PtMP in 80ghz... or maybe 60ghz? > > It seems like the only real option here is 28ghz. > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> > wrote: > > You can buy spectrum in 28GHz and use Cambridge like Vivato does or > depending on how many clients and range you are talking about, maybe > something in 24 or 80GHz. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 2:58 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution > > > > You know that's why they sync, right? You can have a whole lot of sync'ed > APs/masters at the one site and as long as they're transmitting at the same > time and the client/slave sites aren't nearing the different master's > you'll be fine. > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Brett A Mansfield < > [email protected]> wrote: > > That is exactly what I'm looking for. I need something inexpensive > comparatively and it needs to be PtMP. I could use airfibers if I could do > PTP, but that would be FAR too many radios in one location competing for > airtime. > > > > Josh, I currently use 3.65, but I need high capacity. 80Mb at best is not > near enough. > > Thank you, > > Brett A Mansfield > > > On May 29, 2015, at 3:44 PM, Daniel White <[email protected]> wrote: > > You’re looking for licensed PtMP backhaul? > > > > If that is the case, then CCS has a 28GHz offering with StraightPath. But > not sure what you’re looking at price wise. You may just investigate > multiple 23GHz shots or something similar depending on distance. > > > > Just want to make sure the request is clear. > > > > *************************************************************************** > > Daniel White - Managing Director > > SAF North America LLC > > Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 > > [email protected] > > Skype: danieldwhite > Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84> > > > > *************************************************************************** > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Brett A Mansfield > *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 3:42 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution > > > > I'm looking for backhaul. Anything in 2.4 or 5GHz won't work. > > Thank you, > > Brett A Mansfield > > > On May 29, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > EPMP and maybe Ubnt AC > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On May 29, 2015 5:32 PM, "Brett A Mansfield" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'm looking for the best high capacity and low cost PTMP solution. This is > for my backhauls to distribute to smaller cells in a large area. Anyone > know of something that fits this description? > > Thank you, > Brett A Mansfield > > > ------------------------------ > > [image: Avast logo] <http://www.avast.com/> > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > www.avast.com > > > > > > > > > >
