60 and 240GHz can make wireless in urban areas actually be able to compete with cable and maybe even fiber.
Thank you, Brett A Mansfield > On May 29, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Brett A Mansfield <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Id stay ahead of the curve. There is a LOT of spectrum out there going > unused. For example, 60GHz and 240GHz. Yes they cannot go very far, but it > seems none of the other high frequency stuff can either. And these are very > high capacity. > > Thank you, > Brett A Mansfield > >> On May 29, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Maybe you can explain what you would do different than all the other >> manufacturers that would solve the problem. >> >> Rory >> >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield >> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:33 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution >> >> You don't need a lot of money to start manufacturing. You just need to know >> the right people. >> >> Thank you, >> Brett A Mansfield >> >> On May 29, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Jason McKemie >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I hope you have a lot more money than most people here... >> >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Brett A Mansfield >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yep, it sure does seem that way. I'm trying to think outside of the box, but >> every time I do I get back to the same place. Nothing I can do this with is >> on the market yet or never will be. I'm getting more and more tempted every >> day to start manufacturing my own stuff. I've already started looking into >> that. >> >> Anything you guys would like to see come to market? If I go into >> manufacturing I'm going to be all in. >> >> Thank you, >> Brett A Mansfield >> >> On May 29, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> You need a different strategy. >> >> Rory >> >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield >> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:18 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution >> >> You're very right about the 24GHz. I know several companies are working on >> something in 60GHz which would be ideal because it's not a very large area >> and can be daisy chained into a ring. 80GHz would be fine, but like you said >> nothing seems to exist. These CCS devices look great and might be exactly >> what I'm looking for. I just hope the price is right. They are 26 and 28GHz. >> But I think Vivint has a bit of a monopoly in my area with all of their >> 28GHz radios all over the place. I'm afraid the noise would be too much, >> even with the narrow beams. >> >> Thank you, >> Brett A Mansfield >> >> On May 29, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm pretty sure the FCC doesn't allow PtMP in 24ghz. I don't know if >> anything exists for PtMP in 80ghz... or maybe 60ghz? >> >> It seems like the only real option here is 28ghz. >> >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: >> You can buy spectrum in 28GHz and use Cambridge like Vivato does or >> depending on how many clients and range you are talking about, maybe >> something in 24 or 80GHz. >> >> Rory >> >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman >> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 2:58 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution >> >> You know that's why they sync, right? You can have a whole lot of sync'ed >> APs/masters at the one site and as long as they're transmitting at the same >> time and the client/slave sites aren't nearing the different master's you'll >> be fine. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Brett A Mansfield >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> That is exactly what I'm looking for. I need something inexpensive >> comparatively and it needs to be PtMP. I could use airfibers if I could do >> PTP, but that would be FAR too many radios in one location competing for >> airtime. >> >> Josh, I currently use 3.65, but I need high capacity. 80Mb at best is not >> near enough. >> >> Thank you, >> Brett A Mansfield >> >> On May 29, 2015, at 3:44 PM, Daniel White <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> You’re looking for licensed PtMP backhaul? >> >> If that is the case, then CCS has a 28GHz offering with StraightPath. But >> not sure what you’re looking at price wise. You may just investigate >> multiple 23GHz shots or something similar depending on distance. >> >> Just want to make sure the request is clear. >> >> *************************************************************************** >> Daniel White - Managing Director >> SAF North America LLC >> Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 >> [email protected] >> Skype: danieldwhite >> Social: LinkedIn >> >> *************************************************************************** >> >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brett A Mansfield >> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 3:42 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution >> >> I'm looking for backhaul. Anything in 2.4 or 5GHz won't work. >> >> Thank you, >> Brett A Mansfield >> >> On May 29, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> EPMP and maybe Ubnt AC >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On May 29, 2015 5:32 PM, "Brett A Mansfield" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> I'm looking for the best high capacity and low cost PTMP solution. This is >> for my backhauls to distribute to smaller cells in a large area. Anyone know >> of something that fits this description? >> >> Thank you, >> Brett A Mansfield >> >> >> >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> www.avast.com >> >> >> >> >>
