I think Steve Coran said on the WISPA list that new equipment can still be certified for the old rules at this point... but I'm not completely certain that I'm remembering that right.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > It’s still a question I don’t know the answer to. If any 3650 > equipment manufacturer, even Mercury or Telrad, wanted to release some new > hardware variant at this point, could they? Or are equipment approvals in > the same boat as NN licenses? > > > *From:* George Skorup <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, June 07, 2015 5:40 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i > > I think the 450i is only going to be 5GHz. > > We'd probably be better off asking WB or KP to make us a 3GHz panel for > use with the connectorized SM. Or... maybe a slant SuperStinger so we don't > have to buy the more expensive connectorized SM. That didn't work out so > well for 2.4, but maybe 3.6 is possible? > > On 6/7/2015 5:18 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > > I should know the answer, but is there going to be an integrated panel > version of the 3.65 GHz SM? > > My real question, I guess, is whether new equipment approvals can go > through under the old Part 90 rules? Or has the FCC essentially frozen the > equipment market in that band for the next year or so? An integrated 12-15 > inch diamond shaped panel would have been nice, although I’d probably > settle for some better choices of external dual slant panels that don’t > cost an arm and a leg but also aren’t junk. > > Maybe something like this, except it doesn’t seem to actually exist in > real life, and judging from other Mars panels, would be way too expensive: > http://www.mars-antennas.com/MA-WA36-DP19 > > *From:* Matt Mangriotis <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 3:33 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i > > > Regarding *official* launch and availability… the PMP 450i is scheduled > to be publicly announced and officially released in July. We will have > several sets of Beta test and demo equipment around in late June, so you’ll > be seeing it around more at that time. > > > > Matt > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *David > *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 2:39 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i > > > > Its too bad I did not get 150 of those instead of the regular ones. > next batch I will get a few of em to let our techs install. They are > already > had a heads up about this and have been waiting for me to order them. > > > On 05/29/2015 02:10 PM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: > > Nah… if it were, it would be the i450. > > > > > > The “i” is very special and means different things to different folks… > this thing is much more than just “integrated”. It’s the next generation > of hardware, and brings more performance to the table (both physical and > RF). > > > > Keep the questions coming. > > > > Matt > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's made by Apple. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Adam Moffett" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Friday, May 29, 2015 1:56:09 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i > > So....the "i" is for "integrated" antenna? > Or is there something more special about it? > > > > > > > > >
