That would be dumb anyway. You can only sell it for 12 months. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 7, 2015 7:48 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think Steve Coran said on the WISPA list that new equipment can still be > certified for the old rules at this point... but I'm not completely certain > that I'm remembering that right. > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It’s still a question I don’t know the answer to. If any 3650 >> equipment manufacturer, even Mercury or Telrad, wanted to release some new >> hardware variant at this point, could they? Or are equipment approvals in >> the same boat as NN licenses? >> >> >> *From:* George Skorup <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Sunday, June 07, 2015 5:40 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i >> >> I think the 450i is only going to be 5GHz. >> >> We'd probably be better off asking WB or KP to make us a 3GHz panel for >> use with the connectorized SM. Or... maybe a slant SuperStinger so we don't >> have to buy the more expensive connectorized SM. That didn't work out so >> well for 2.4, but maybe 3.6 is possible? >> >> On 6/7/2015 5:18 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >> >> I should know the answer, but is there going to be an integrated panel >> version of the 3.65 GHz SM? >> >> My real question, I guess, is whether new equipment approvals can go >> through under the old Part 90 rules? Or has the FCC essentially frozen the >> equipment market in that band for the next year or so? An integrated 12-15 >> inch diamond shaped panel would have been nice, although I’d probably >> settle for some better choices of external dual slant panels that don’t >> cost an arm and a leg but also aren’t junk. >> >> Maybe something like this, except it doesn’t seem to actually exist in >> real life, and judging from other Mars panels, would be way too expensive: >> http://www.mars-antennas.com/MA-WA36-DP19 >> >> *From:* Matt Mangriotis <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 3:33 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i >> >> >> Regarding *official* launch and availability… the PMP 450i is scheduled >> to be publicly announced and officially released in July. We will have >> several sets of Beta test and demo equipment around in late June, so you’ll >> be seeing it around more at that time. >> >> >> >> Matt >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *David >> *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 2:39 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i >> >> >> >> Its too bad I did not get 150 of those instead of the regular ones. >> next batch I will get a few of em to let our techs install. They are >> already >> had a heads up about this and have been waiting for me to order them. >> >> >> On 05/29/2015 02:10 PM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: >> >> Nah… if it were, it would be the i450. >> >> >> >> >> >> The “i” is very special and means different things to different folks… >> this thing is much more than just “integrated”. It’s the next generation >> of hardware, and brings more performance to the table (both physical and >> RF). >> >> >> >> Keep the questions coming. >> >> >> >> Matt >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It's made by Apple. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Adam Moffett" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Friday, May 29, 2015 1:56:09 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i >> >> So....the "i" is for "integrated" antenna? >> Or is there something more special about it? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
