I'm talking about 3.65ghz... which would also be kind of dumb at this
point, but I think they could technically sell it for the next 5 years.

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
wrote:

> That would be dumb anyway.  You can only sell it for 12 months.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Jun 7, 2015 7:48 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think Steve Coran said on the WISPA list that new equipment can still
>> be certified for the old rules at this point... but I'm not completely
>> certain that I'm remembering that right.
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>   It’s still a question I don’t know the answer to.  If any 3650
>>> equipment manufacturer, even Mercury or Telrad, wanted to release some new
>>> hardware variant at this point, could they?  Or are equipment approvals in
>>> the same boat as NN licenses?
>>>
>>>
>>>  *From:* George Skorup <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, June 07, 2015 5:40 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i
>>>
>>> I think the 450i is only going to be 5GHz.
>>>
>>> We'd probably be better off asking WB or KP to make us a 3GHz panel for
>>> use with the connectorized SM. Or... maybe a slant SuperStinger so we don't
>>> have to buy the more expensive connectorized SM. That didn't work out so
>>> well for 2.4, but maybe 3.6 is possible?
>>>
>>> On 6/7/2015 5:18 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>
>>>  I should know the answer, but is there going to be an integrated panel
>>> version of the 3.65 GHz SM?
>>>
>>> My real question, I guess, is whether new equipment approvals can go
>>> through under the old Part 90 rules?  Or has the FCC essentially frozen the
>>> equipment market in that band for the next year or so?  An integrated 12-15
>>> inch diamond shaped panel would have been nice, although I’d probably
>>> settle for some better choices of external dual slant panels that don’t
>>> cost an arm and a leg but also aren’t junk.
>>>
>>> Maybe something like this, except it doesn’t seem to actually exist in
>>> real life, and judging from other Mars panels, would be way too expensive:
>>> http://www.mars-antennas.com/MA-WA36-DP19
>>>
>>>  *From:* Matt Mangriotis <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 3:33 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i
>>>
>>>
>>> Regarding *official* launch and availability… the PMP 450i is scheduled
>>> to be publicly announced and officially released in July.  We will have
>>> several sets of Beta test and demo equipment around in late June, so you’ll
>>> be seeing it around more at that time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *David
>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 29, 2015 2:39 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Its too bad I did not get 150 of those instead of the regular ones.
>>> next batch I will get a few of em to let our techs install. They are
>>> already
>>> had a heads up about this and have been waiting for me to order them.
>>>
>>>
>>>  On 05/29/2015 02:10 PM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:
>>>
>>> Nah…  if it were, it would be the i450.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The “i” is very special and means different things to different folks…
>>> this thing is much more than just “integrated”.  It’s the next generation
>>> of hardware, and brings more performance to the table (both physical and
>>> RF).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Keep the questions coming.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  It's made by Apple.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From: *"Adam Moffett" <[email protected]>
>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>> *Sent: *Friday, May 29, 2015 1:56:09 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450i
>>>
>>> So....the "i" is for "integrated" antenna?
>>> Or is there something more special about it?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to