Wasn't there something posted the other day about these ccrs and cores to ports? Have you tested this in all 7 bridged ports with the same result? On Jun 9, 2015 11:42 PM, "Brett A Mansfield" <li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
> They can ping the WAN public, but not the next hop. > > Thank you, > Brett A Mansfield > > On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > Can the devices on publics ping the WAN public? Next hop up? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Jun 9, 2015 11:39 PM, "Brett A Mansfield" <li...@silverlakeinternet.com> > wrote: > >> All UBNT. Almost every model XM and XW and a few dozen of their AC line. >> >> Thank you, >> Brett A Mansfield >> >> On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:31 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: >> >> What radios? >> >> On 6/9/2015 9:44 PM, Brett A Mansfield wrote: >> >> The public is on bridge1. VLAN 100 is a layer on top of bridge1. So >> public is not tagged and VLAN 100 is, both on bridge1. I have each CPE >> getting an IP address on VLAN 100 and bridging the public to the customers >> router. >> >> Thank you, >> Brett A Mansfield >> >> On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:39 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >> wrote: >> >> Is 192.168.100.1 and 108.165.x.x both on the vlan interface? Or one >> bridge1 and one vlan100? >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Brett A Mansfield < >> li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote: >> >>> The public IPs are not on a VLAN. The subnet is 108.165.x.0/24. >>> >>> I currently have eth1-eth7 bridged. Bridge1 is where I have the public >>> IPs. Bridge1 VLAN 100 is the private IPs of 192.168.100.0/24. I don't >>> use the SFP+ ports yet. Eth8 is the internet port. It has an IP address of >>> 108.165.x.246/30. I currently have this confit on an UBNT edgerouter and it >>> works flawlessly other than the random panics of the OS. The local public >>> subnet is routed. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Brett A Mansfield >>> >>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:29 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Are the public IPs on the VLAN 100 interface? >>> >>> Need some configuration here. What are the device's IPs/subnets? >>> What is the Mikrotik's LAN/vlan100 IP/subnet? What about WAN? Is the >>> local "LAN" public subnet routed to the rest of the world? >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Brett A Mansfield < >>> li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I am fairly new to Mikrotik and I cannot get it to do what I want. I >>>> have the CCR1036-8G-2S+. I have one VLAN using private IPs. It’s VLAN >>>> 100. I also have a /24 subnet of public IPs. I have NAT setup for the >>>> VLAN because it does need internet access. I have no NAT on the untagged >>>> VLAN of public IPs. I can access the net using VLAN 100, but not the >>>> public IPs. Anyone else run into this or have any ideas or thoughts? >>>> >>>> I’ve tried both Static and Dynamic IPs. I have NOT tried to removing >>>> the VLAN 100 yet. I will give that a shot later today. I do not have any >>>> kind of firewall on here just yet. >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> Brett A Mansfield >>>> Silver Lake Internet, LLC >>>> >>> >>> >> >>
