......angry words
On 8/9/2015 5:21 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Latency is always that with ePMP on dfs... as far as I can tell it's
pretty much the same whether you use flexible or fixed ratio... and
ePTP doesn't support dfs last I checked.
On Aug 9, 2015 4:41 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
OK so back to ePMP PTP. I had to put up a 500' link between two
grain legs. Used integrated radios on 2.4.3. I tried ePTP, but
they wouldn't link up. Thinking maybe too short? I don't know, so
I just switched them to TDD PTP w/ flexible framing instead.
Latency is like 15ms. I hate it. I have a couple other links still
on 2.3.3 also doing flexible framing and latency is very
consistently 7ms. Only thing I can think is that this new short
link is on 5.4GHz and it's actually forcing fixed framing (even
though it says flexible) because of DFS? Either that or something
is very different between 2.3.3 and 2.4.3.
Anyway.. we were thinking about switching out a bunch of 5GHz
Rocket links (because they cannot handle noise at all) with ePMP
GPS. We get very good latency with the Rockets, typically under
3ms when the front ends aren't swamped, but I will NOT do 15-20ms
with ePMP, that's just stupid. The whole idea was sync, and since
ePTP doesn't sync.. not sure what to do. Maybe 2.5ms framing and
50/50 TDD will get me 7ms, and w/ sync?
