Well, that's not a problem with AF5x... they take less than 15 watts. On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:33 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote:
> Except for the 40-50 watts per radio. > > On 8/9/2015 8:53 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > I figure we can get away with having one or two synced ePMP links, but > when a tower is 3+ hops out, some of those are going to need to be lower > latency links. > > I suppose the way to go would be to just use airFiber everywhere... almost > no latency and sync. > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:25 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, last-mile I'm not so concerned with. It's the 50+ miles of PTP links >> that add up. Now double that if a link goes down and traffic goes the long >> way 'round. I'm all for licensed, but the guy that writes the checks isn't. >> :( >> >> On 8/9/2015 6:36 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> >> Oh for backhauls yes. I thought you were talking about those last mile >> extra bumps from the grain leg to home. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Aug 9, 2015 7:22 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Well, it's a big deal to me after two or three links. And there's no >>> reason to go licensed on these paths (yet). >>> >>> On 8/9/2015 4:59 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>> >>> Hmm I never had a problem getting them started. FWIW I'm getting 1-2 ms >>> from my desktop, through my router/eptp/switches at the tower down to our >>> BMU. >>> >>> I also don't think 20ms is that big a deal for most customers. If they >>> get say 60ms from their machine to most anything in a datacenter they >>> should be better off than most cable/dsl circuits, no? >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 5:55 PM, George Skorup < <[email protected]> >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes. Ran out of time and had to get the link back up. Could've been >>>> something else stupid I overlooked though. I'll mess with a pair in the >>>> office next week. >>>> >>>> On 8/9/2015 4:48 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>> >>>> Did you set the slave to eptp slave? They use different drivers. >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> On Aug 9, 2015 5:41 PM, "George Skorup" < <[email protected]> >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> OK so back to ePMP PTP. I had to put up a 500' link between two grain >>>>> legs. Used integrated radios on 2.4.3. I tried ePTP, but they wouldn't >>>>> link >>>>> up. Thinking maybe too short? I don't know, so I just switched them to TDD >>>>> PTP w/ flexible framing instead. Latency is like 15ms. I hate it. I have a >>>>> couple other links still on 2.3.3 also doing flexible framing and latency >>>>> is very consistently 7ms. Only thing I can think is that this new short >>>>> link is on 5.4GHz and it's actually forcing fixed framing (even though it >>>>> says flexible) because of DFS? Either that or something is very different >>>>> between 2.3.3 and 2.4.3. >>>>> >>>>> Anyway.. we were thinking about switching out a bunch of 5GHz Rocket >>>>> links (because they cannot handle noise at all) with ePMP GPS. We get very >>>>> good latency with the Rockets, typically under 3ms when the front ends >>>>> aren't swamped, but I will NOT do 15-20ms with ePMP, that's just stupid. >>>>> The whole idea was sync, and since ePTP doesn't sync.. not sure what to >>>>> do. >>>>> Maybe 2.5ms framing and 50/50 TDD will get me 7ms, and w/ sync? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
