Except for the 40-50 watts per radio.
On 8/9/2015 8:53 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
I figure we can get away with having one or two synced ePMP links, but
when a tower is 3+ hops out, some of those are going to need to be
lower latency links.
I suppose the way to go would be to just use airFiber everywhere...
almost no latency and sync.
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:25 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yes, last-mile I'm not so concerned with. It's the 50+ miles of
PTP links that add up. Now double that if a link goes down and
traffic goes the long way 'round. I'm all for licensed, but the
guy that writes the checks isn't. :(
On 8/9/2015 6:36 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Oh for backhauls yes. I thought you were talking about those
last mile extra bumps from the grain leg to home.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 9, 2015 7:22 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Well, it's a big deal to me after two or three links. And
there's no reason to go licensed on these paths (yet).
On 8/9/2015 4:59 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Hmm I never had a problem getting them started. FWIW I'm
getting 1-2 ms from my desktop, through my
router/eptp/switches at the tower down to our BMU.
I also don't think 20ms is that big a deal for most
customers. If they get say 60ms from their machine to most
anything in a datacenter they should be better off than most
cable/dsl circuits, no?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 5:55 PM, George Skorup
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yes. Ran out of time and had to get the link back up.
Could've been something else stupid I overlooked though.
I'll mess with a pair in the office next week.
On 8/9/2015 4:48 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Did you set the slave to eptp slave? They use
different drivers.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 9, 2015 5:41 PM, "George Skorup"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
OK so back to ePMP PTP. I had to put up a 500' link
between two grain legs. Used integrated radios on
2.4.3. I tried ePTP, but they wouldn't link up.
Thinking maybe too short? I don't know, so I just
switched them to TDD PTP w/ flexible framing
instead. Latency is like 15ms. I hate it. I have a
couple other links still on 2.3.3 also doing
flexible framing and latency is very consistently
7ms. Only thing I can think is that this new short
link is on 5.4GHz and it's actually forcing fixed
framing (even though it says flexible) because of
DFS? Either that or something is very different
between 2.3.3 and 2.4.3.
Anyway.. we were thinking about switching out a
bunch of 5GHz Rocket links (because they cannot
handle noise at all) with ePMP GPS. We get very
good latency with the Rockets, typically under 3ms
when the front ends aren't swamped, but I will NOT
do 15-20ms with ePMP, that's just stupid. The whole
idea was sync, and since ePTP doesn't sync.. not
sure what to do. Maybe 2.5ms framing and 50/50 TDD
will get me 7ms, and w/ sync?
