Well between towers what's stopping you from eptp? Should be an easy Monday morning. Give me a ring if you can't get them associated.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 9, 2015 9:25 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, last-mile I'm not so concerned with. It's the 50+ miles of PTP links > that add up. Now double that if a link goes down and traffic goes the long > way 'round. I'm all for licensed, but the guy that writes the checks isn't. > :( > > On 8/9/2015 6:36 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Oh for backhauls yes. I thought you were talking about those last mile > extra bumps from the grain leg to home. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Aug 9, 2015 7:22 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, it's a big deal to me after two or three links. And there's no >> reason to go licensed on these paths (yet). >> >> On 8/9/2015 4:59 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> >> Hmm I never had a problem getting them started. FWIW I'm getting 1-2 ms >> from my desktop, through my router/eptp/switches at the tower down to our >> BMU. >> >> I also don't think 20ms is that big a deal for most customers. If they >> get say 60ms from their machine to most anything in a datacenter they >> should be better off than most cable/dsl circuits, no? >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 5:55 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yes. Ran out of time and had to get the link back up. Could've been >>> something else stupid I overlooked though. I'll mess with a pair in the >>> office next week. >>> >>> On 8/9/2015 4:48 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>> >>> Did you set the slave to eptp slave? They use different drivers. >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Aug 9, 2015 5:41 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> OK so back to ePMP PTP. I had to put up a 500' link between two grain >>>> legs. Used integrated radios on 2.4.3. I tried ePTP, but they wouldn't link >>>> up. Thinking maybe too short? I don't know, so I just switched them to TDD >>>> PTP w/ flexible framing instead. Latency is like 15ms. I hate it. I have a >>>> couple other links still on 2.3.3 also doing flexible framing and latency >>>> is very consistently 7ms. Only thing I can think is that this new short >>>> link is on 5.4GHz and it's actually forcing fixed framing (even though it >>>> says flexible) because of DFS? Either that or something is very different >>>> between 2.3.3 and 2.4.3. >>>> >>>> Anyway.. we were thinking about switching out a bunch of 5GHz Rocket >>>> links (because they cannot handle noise at all) with ePMP GPS. We get very >>>> good latency with the Rockets, typically under 3ms when the front ends >>>> aren't swamped, but I will NOT do 15-20ms with ePMP, that's just stupid. >>>> The whole idea was sync, and since ePTP doesn't sync.. not sure what to do. >>>> Maybe 2.5ms framing and 50/50 TDD will get me 7ms, and w/ sync? >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
