Not yet. I bet it comes sooner than Ubnt DFS at all :( Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 9, 2015 6:21 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Latency is always that with ePMP on dfs... as far as I can tell it's > pretty much the same whether you use flexible or fixed ratio... and ePTP > doesn't support dfs last I checked. > On Aug 9, 2015 4:41 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> OK so back to ePMP PTP. I had to put up a 500' link between two grain >> legs. Used integrated radios on 2.4.3. I tried ePTP, but they wouldn't link >> up. Thinking maybe too short? I don't know, so I just switched them to TDD >> PTP w/ flexible framing instead. Latency is like 15ms. I hate it. I have a >> couple other links still on 2.3.3 also doing flexible framing and latency >> is very consistently 7ms. Only thing I can think is that this new short >> link is on 5.4GHz and it's actually forcing fixed framing (even though it >> says flexible) because of DFS? Either that or something is very different >> between 2.3.3 and 2.4.3. >> >> Anyway.. we were thinking about switching out a bunch of 5GHz Rocket >> links (because they cannot handle noise at all) with ePMP GPS. We get very >> good latency with the Rockets, typically under 3ms when the front ends >> aren't swamped, but I will NOT do 15-20ms with ePMP, that's just stupid. >> The whole idea was sync, and since ePTP doesn't sync.. not sure what to do. >> Maybe 2.5ms framing and 50/50 TDD will get me 7ms, and w/ sync? >> >
