Whatever you do, don't go the ITElite route with the dual band antennas and the horrible F/B as Mathew Howard mentioned...
Regards, Chuck On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > 2.4ghz or 5ghz? > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Jerry Head <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> My Cambium ePMP sectors say "Mars Antenna" on them. >> >> >> On 8/10/2015 10:28 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> >> The Cambium OEM is RF elements. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Aug 10, 2015 11:24 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I think it's the same rough design with the RF Elements ones being >>> slightly "better". >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>> http://www.midwest-ix.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Chuck Hogg" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Monday, August 10, 2015 10:19:46 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP? >>> >>> I think those are the ePMP sectors? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Chuck >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Christopher Gray < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm considering the RF Elements "Carrier Class" 5GHz 17dBi and 2.4 GHz >>>> 14dBi sectors. >>>> >>>> Any positive experience with these? I need some relatively small >>>> sectors (in the <2' height range). I like the visual simplicity and low >>>> cost of the older RF Elements "MiMo Sectors" but I wonder if their new >>>> versions perform significantly better. >>>> >>>> -Chris >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
