I know. My statement remains. However, it could be that Cambium is measuring from the "worst" at the time (5250) and RF Elements is measuring at the best.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 10:28:52 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP? The Cambium OEM is RF elements. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 10, 2015 11:24 AM, "Mike Hammett" < [email protected] > wrote: I think it's the same rough design with the RF Elements ones being slightly "better". ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com From: "Chuck Hogg" < [email protected] > To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 10:19:46 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP? I think those are the ePMP sectors? Regards, Chuck On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Christopher Gray < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> I'm considering the RF Elements "Carrier Class" 5GHz 17dBi and 2.4 GHz 14dBi sectors. Any positive experience with these? I need some relatively small sectors (in the <2' height range). I like the visual simplicity and low cost of the older RF Elements "MiMo Sectors" but I wonder if their new versions perform significantly better. -Chris </blockquote>
