I wouldn't. You're welcome to, though. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 11, 2015 12:34 PM, "Christopher Gray" <[email protected]> wrote:
> A followup question before ordering... > > The UBNT Titanium AM-M-V5G-Ti antenna fits my dimensional requirements and > has similar specifications to the RF Elements Carrier Class 5 GHz 17 dBi > antenna. > > Although it is more expensive, should I consider trying the Titanium > before the RF Elements unit? > > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Whatever you do, don't go the ITElite route with the dual band antennas >> and the horrible F/B as Mathew Howard mentioned... >> >> Regards, >> Chuck >> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> 2.4ghz or 5ghz? >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Jerry Head <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> My Cambium ePMP sectors say "Mars Antenna" on them. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 8/10/2015 10:28 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>> >>>> The Cambium OEM is RF elements. >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> On Aug 10, 2015 11:24 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think it's the same rough design with the RF Elements ones being >>>>> slightly "better". >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>> >>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> *From: *"Chuck Hogg" <[email protected]> >>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>> *Sent: *Monday, August 10, 2015 10:19:46 AM >>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP? >>>>> >>>>> I think those are the ePMP sectors? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Chuck >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Christopher Gray < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm considering the RF Elements "Carrier Class" 5GHz 17dBi and 2.4 >>>>>> GHz 14dBi sectors. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any positive experience with these? I need some relatively small >>>>>> sectors (in the <2' height range). I like the visual simplicity and low >>>>>> cost of the older RF Elements "MiMo Sectors" but I wonder if their new >>>>>> versions perform significantly better. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Chris >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
