I have been extremely impressed with the new UBNT AC sectors.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:
> Go by the F/B ratio. Makes a huge difference.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 8/11/2015 9:34 AM, Christopher Gray wrote:
>
> A followup question before ordering...
>
> The UBNT Titanium AM-M-V5G-Ti antenna fits my dimensional requirements and
> has similar specifications to the RF Elements Carrier Class 5 GHz 17 dBi
> antenna.
>
> Although it is more expensive, should I consider trying the Titanium
> before the RF Elements unit?
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Whatever you do, don't go the ITElite route with the dual band antennas
>> and the horrible F/B as Mathew Howard mentioned...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chuck
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 2.4ghz or 5ghz?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Jerry Head <
>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> My Cambium ePMP sectors say "Mars Antenna" on them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/10/2015 10:28 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Cambium OEM is RF elements.
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>> On Aug 10, 2015 11:24 AM, "Mike Hammett" < <[email protected]>
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think it's the same rough design with the RF Elements ones being
>>>>> slightly "better".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>> <http://www.ics-il.com>http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>
>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>>>> <http://www.midwest-ix.com>http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> *From: *"Chuck Hogg" < <[email protected]>[email protected]>
>>>>> *To: * <[email protected]>[email protected]
>>>>> *Sent: *Monday, August 10, 2015 10:19:46 AM
>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think those are the ePMP sectors?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Christopher Gray <
>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm considering the RF Elements "Carrier Class" 5GHz 17dBi and 2.4
>>>>>> GHz 14dBi sectors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any positive experience with these? I need some relatively small
>>>>>> sectors (in the <2' height range). I like the visual simplicity and low
>>>>>> cost of the older RF Elements "MiMo Sectors" but I wonder if their new
>>>>>> versions perform significantly better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Chris
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
