RF Elements made them for Cambium Regards, Chuck
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it's the same rough design with the RF Elements ones being > slightly "better". > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Chuck Hogg" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Monday, August 10, 2015 10:19:46 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP? > > I think those are the ePMP sectors? > > Regards, > Chuck > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Christopher Gray < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm considering the RF Elements "Carrier Class" 5GHz 17dBi and 2.4 GHz >> 14dBi sectors. >> >> Any positive experience with these? I need some relatively small sectors >> (in the <2' height range). I like the visual simplicity and low cost of the >> older RF Elements "MiMo Sectors" but I wonder if their new versions perform >> significantly better. >> >> -Chris >> > > >
