Yea, the army is funny.

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015, 4:13 PM David Milholen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Several years ago i was at camp robinson firing range to qualify our young
> soldiers and as weapons were being handed out one soldier was denied due to
> criminal check that had just came into light and he was not allowed to
> train with the rest of us until his name was totally cleared to hold a live
> weapon during
> a qualification training exorcise.
>   These same checks and restrictions could be implemented to help with
> better control of who should be allowed to carry a weapon for safety or
> have one for home defense.
> As I was trained on lots of weapon systems. One of the advantages of being
> a good shot is getting to have the most powerful urban scope and all the
> trimmings for your
> primary weapon as the M4. Others that did not get a high enough score to
> get one of these had to settle for red dot or iron site. The ones that
> could not shoot to even make
> marksman was issued a shotgun.
>  Of course different units handled this differently.
>
>
>
>
> On 10/10/2015 3:01 PM, Patrick Leary wrote:
>
> Gun owner here of a very nice S&W MP40 with grip laser, and a smaller 9MM,
> and unlike most on this list I’m a veteran too professionally trained in a
> variety of weapons systems. That said, my views are not what one might
> expect because above all I believe in rationality. Absolutism, like
> literalism, is another name for extremism and such people have an aversion
> to science and reason.
>
>
>
> We are the only country so lacking in judgment, so unable to grasp the
> concept of proportionality (reacting to real risk, versus chicken shit
> fear) that we’ll spend trillions of dollars, lead thousands of our own to
> death, and maim and/or inflict PTSD upon tens of thousands to stop
> “terrorism,” when statistically the real threat of being impacted by terror
> is less likely than breaking your hip in the shower. Meanwhile, guns
> improperly used or otherwise used for indefensible violence have killed
> more people in the past 40 years than all our wars combined since the birth
> of the nation and we say there’s nothing we can do because “freedom.”
>
>
>
> We are a country whose population is chronically unable to process fact,
> lives in perpetual fear of their neighbors, nor can think critically on a
> great many truly existential problems.
>
>
>
> Finally, I have a CCP, but I don’t unless I were out hiking or
> motorcycling out somewhere remotely. Of all the reasons the conceal carry,
> the worst argument is because one is afraid of everything and everyone
> around them. Civilized societies simply don’t do this. That’s not a
> debatable point. Why so many yearn for us to be like Mogadishu instead of
> Copenhagen is beyond me. Why, so you can blast away in a busy parking lot
> at a truck fleeing a Home Depot driven by a guy who shoplifted? Yay! How
> safe are we!
>
>
>
> Patrick Leary
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
>
>
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 10, 2015 12:00 PM
> *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings
>
>
>
> The debate is basically a Mexican Stand Off...I am done with it ...look at
> current political condition on all sides.    Email crap to implosion of the
> Grumpy Old Party.  On a side note the disjointed actions and antics of
> Republican party are entertainment to me.  Between Bozo the clown and that
> "open mouth, insert foot" guy McCarthy it sure is funny.  As i tell my
> super right wing creationist friend...you guys are your own worst enemy.
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> Yes, the meaning clearly was for militia to be able to defend the state,
> but it is also pretty clear that they were intended to be able to defend
> against the government, if necessary. That doesn't work if the government
> has complete control over who can bear arms.
>
> On Oct 10, 2015 10:06 AM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> The 2nd Amendment was based on English version which came earlier and its
> meaning was for militia to be able to defend state.   I don't want to get
> into a history lesson or political debate.   But freedom and individual
> rights do not and should over ride individual responsibility. Hell we have
> to take tests to obtain a drivers license...it offers some  level of order
> on the roads.  It is too easy for people in USA to but guns. Hunting is one
> thing...you don't hunt with a hand gun or AK!!!   The wackos and lobbyists
> for NRA and extreme groups will fight  tooth and nail any attempt to
> regulate them citing their rights! What about the right to act responsibly
> and live in peace.   Doesn't portent well for our children....
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> Freedom is not the exercise to choose whatever you want.  Heck then free
> all the child molesters! Human beings need to be controlled, that the whole
> reasoning behind laws.  Im with Jaime and Stefan on this.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There are many items that kill more humans than first world guns.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]>
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Sent: *Friday, October 9, 2015 11:21:43 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings
>
> Looking at this with a foreign view I can't understand this "gun love" in
> US. It is not all about the criminals or idiots. Just look at the
> statistics for accidents with weapons. The only way to save lifes is to be
> very restrictive. If someone wants to shoot he can go to a shooting club
> and leave the weapon there. It is not freedom to have a gun at home. It is
> silly esp. with kids around.
>
> You can't avoid killing with banning weapons but you can reduce it. If I
> need a weapon I call for police or security.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
> viruses.
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
> viruses.
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
>
> --
>

Reply via email to