I'll second that! I had a customer just the other day that pays for my 25Mb 
plan, but was only getting 23Mb consistently, over wireless, on the top floor 
with the router in the basement. 

I have another customer that complains weekly that pays for 15Mb and complains 
almost daily that she cannot stream 3 or 4 movies at a time and that the 
Internet is just too slow. I gave her a FREE trial for 30 days on my top plan 
of 25Mb which fully resolved her issue by her own admission, but won't upgrade 
and still complains daily. 

Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield

> On Oct 16, 2015, at 9:04 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Unless you a Utahn, then you always pick the bottom plan and complain that it 
> doesn’t deliver the top plan performance.
>  
>  
>  
> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 11:15 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 10Gbps FTTH
>  
> That is a golden sales and marketing rule. Always have 3 plans, and 80% of 
> the people will pick the middle option... then 10% on the top and 10% on the 
> bottom. 
> 
> Travis
> 
> 
> On 10/16/2015 11:05 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
> Maybe so you can tell your wife “see honey, I didn’t get the fastest plan 
> they offered, I compromised to save money”.  Given 3 choices, you always pick 
> the one in the middle.  Pick the silver, not the bronze or gold plan.
>  
> One thing I worry about is the content providers may be pushing for a world 
> where they don’t have to worry about how fast the customer’s connection is, 
> the sky’s the limit.  I suspect some video streams that only need 2.5 or 5 
> Mbps, will stall and sputter unless the customer’s Internet connection is 20 
> or 50 Mbps because they burst the data and go all wonky if those bursts get a 
> haircut in transit.  And to the customer, it’s an ISP problem.  Yet if we try 
> to shape the video traffic to prevent this, we risk violating Open Internet 
> rules by treating some content differently.  So what everyone expects is for 
> us to provide an infinite pipe so customers and content providers can use it 
> however they want.
>  
>  
> From: mailto:[email protected]
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 11:40 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 10Gbps FTTH
>  
> My question is, who is running around complaining that their 1 Gbps Internet 
> sucks? "Oh my god! My Internet is SO SLOW! Someone needs to give me 10Gbps!"
>  
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:28 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would like to see these hippie google bastards tooling around in east st 
> louis, Alphabet would have to generate a body armor company
>  
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:42 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> East St. Louis...
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Ken Hohhof
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 9:33 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 10Gbps FTTH
> 
> This is the New Economy, we don't need no stinkin' profits.
> http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/shinal/2015/10/15/square-ipo-filing-shows-fast-growth-consistent-losses/73985492/
> 
> And in the case of Google Fiber, how would we know if it was profitable?
> Unless Alphabet intends to split off companies to stand on their own.
> 
> I do find it interesting that everyone focuses on the last mile bandwidth,
> as if that's the whole story.  At least with business service, you don't
> have the ridiculous scenario of someone running their 10 Gbps residential
> Internet into an AC3200 router and doing speedtests on their iPad.  But if
> they sell 10 Gbps business service at lower than datacenter bandwidth
> pricing, what happens if businesses start actually using it like DIA or
> datacenter bandwidth?  Like someone decides to sell cloud gaming or
> streaming video or some business model that involves hundreds of screens
> streaming 4K video?  Maybe some real time medical imaging application.
> 
> And all this gigabit activity in cities doesn't really prove much about less
> populated or economically distressed areas.  If Google's intent is to prove
> something, rather than cherry-pick, I'd still like to see them wire Detroit
> or Newark.  Not the wealthy suburbs or select "fiberhoods".  Do the whole
> city and show how it sparks an urban revival.  Or go do a small rural town
> or a tribal reservation.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 10:20 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 10Gbps FTTH
> 
> And, they are operating the system at a profit, right...?
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Travis Johnson
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 8:52 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [AFMUG] 10Gbps FTTH
> 
> Does Google know they are getting out played by a small city? :)
> 
> http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/10/10gbps-internet-offered-by-city-fighting-anti-muni-broadband-laws/
> 
> Travis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
> part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>  
>  

Reply via email to