Reply on WAN? Idk...sounds like a config thing to me.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Darin Steffl <[email protected]> wrote: > Probably defective or needs firmware upgrade. If reviews were good on > Amazon it probably is a decent router. > > Sent from my smartphone. Please excuse any typos. > On Jan 3, 2016 2:20 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Sounds like a winner. DOSed maybe? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Jan 3, 2016 3:16 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> OK, the words you never want to hear on a tech support call: "My >>> brother in law is here and he has a PhD in computer science." And Mr. PhD >>> says the problem is definitely bad Internet service. >>> >>> Oh, and he changed a bunch of stuff the customer doesn't understand and >>> now he's gone back home to Minnesota. >>> >>> Anyway, even after having the customer factory default his new TP-Link >>> Archer C7 AC1750 router, it has a consistent 900-1000 msec ping latency. >>> Plus it's pingable from the Internet by default, which I find unusual. >>> >>> Had the customer fish his old Linksys WRT120N out of the garbage, now >>> with a busted antenna, and speeds and ping times are fine. >>> >>> Hmmmmmmm, I don't have much experience with TP-Link, but this does not >>> give me a good impression. I assumed the brother in law had done something >>> weird with QoS or firewall settings, but it was the same after being >>> defaulted. Customer says it cost like $100 on Amazon and was advertised as >>> having the performance of routers costing twice as much. >>> >>>
