The new one you mentioned, it's pretty good. I know some of our FTTH customers use them.
Regards, Chuck On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:53 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > I haven't been impressed with tplink customers get them, then end up going > back to our free airrouter > On Jan 3, 2016 3:23 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Reply on WAN? Idk...sounds like a config thing to me. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Darin Steffl <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Probably defective or needs firmware upgrade. If reviews were good on >>> Amazon it probably is a decent router. >>> >>> Sent from my smartphone. Please excuse any typos. >>> On Jan 3, 2016 2:20 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Sounds like a winner. DOSed maybe? >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> On Jan 3, 2016 3:16 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> OK, the words you never want to hear on a tech support call: "My >>>>> brother in law is here and he has a PhD in computer science." And Mr. PhD >>>>> says the problem is definitely bad Internet service. >>>>> >>>>> Oh, and he changed a bunch of stuff the customer doesn't understand >>>>> and now he's gone back home to Minnesota. >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, even after having the customer factory default his new TP-Link >>>>> Archer C7 AC1750 router, it has a consistent 900-1000 msec ping latency. >>>>> Plus it's pingable from the Internet by default, which I find unusual. >>>>> >>>>> Had the customer fish his old Linksys WRT120N out of the garbage, now >>>>> with a busted antenna, and speeds and ping times are fine. >>>>> >>>>> Hmmmmmmm, I don't have much experience with TP-Link, but this does not >>>>> give me a good impression. I assumed the brother in law had done >>>>> something >>>>> weird with QoS or firewall settings, but it was the same after being >>>>> defaulted. Customer says it cost like $100 on Amazon and was advertised as >>>>> having the performance of routers costing twice as much. >>>>> >>>>> >>
