I haven't been impressed with tplink customers get them, then end up going back to our free airrouter On Jan 3, 2016 3:23 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Reply on WAN? Idk...sounds like a config thing to me. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Darin Steffl <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Probably defective or needs firmware upgrade. If reviews were good on >> Amazon it probably is a decent router. >> >> Sent from my smartphone. Please excuse any typos. >> On Jan 3, 2016 2:20 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Sounds like a winner. DOSed maybe? >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Jan 3, 2016 3:16 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> OK, the words you never want to hear on a tech support call: "My >>>> brother in law is here and he has a PhD in computer science." And Mr. PhD >>>> says the problem is definitely bad Internet service. >>>> >>>> Oh, and he changed a bunch of stuff the customer doesn't understand and >>>> now he's gone back home to Minnesota. >>>> >>>> Anyway, even after having the customer factory default his new TP-Link >>>> Archer C7 AC1750 router, it has a consistent 900-1000 msec ping latency. >>>> Plus it's pingable from the Internet by default, which I find unusual. >>>> >>>> Had the customer fish his old Linksys WRT120N out of the garbage, now >>>> with a busted antenna, and speeds and ping times are fine. >>>> >>>> Hmmmmmmm, I don't have much experience with TP-Link, but this does not >>>> give me a good impression. I assumed the brother in law had done something >>>> weird with QoS or firewall settings, but it was the same after being >>>> defaulted. Customer says it cost like $100 on Amazon and was advertised as >>>> having the performance of routers costing twice as much. >>>> >>>> >
