I wish they'd come out with software that can actually handle more than 1Gbps per flow on CCR and ditch the low clock per core tile architecture, it's holding them back. It's great for marketing, but its not very practical. On Jan 24, 2016 1:52 PM, "Keefe John" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wish they'd come out with a 48 port CRS. > > On 1/23/2016 9:44 PM, Glen Waldrop wrote: > >> From MT's point of view, if you need more gigE ports, buy a CCR. >> >> They save 50 cents per chip, they also get to push a higher margin >> product. >> >> Thankfully everything seems to be going gigE now. >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Bill Prince >> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 7:55 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? >> >> >> False sense of economy. From an operational standpoint it really >> complicates things. >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> On 1/23/2016 10:03 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >> >>> I never quite understood why they didn’t make all the ports on the 2011 >>> GigE. It’s not that they typically all have to be GigE, it’s just an >>> administrative hassle. It’s kind of annoying to have to risk firmware >>> problems on a new CPU type just to get that, if you don’t need the added >>> processor power. And as a business customer demarc, the desktop case with >>> or without WiFi is popular. Not sure what they are thinking. >>> >> >> >
