http://routerboard.com/RB1100AHx2 
http://routerboard.com/RB3011UiAS-RM 

The testing methodologies may be different, but the 3011 shows just slightly 
less than 1100AHx2. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 


----- Original Message -----

From: "Erich Kaiser" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 7:46:21 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? 


Dennis, 


As far as horsepower are they comparable to RB1100AHx2? I always think, why did 
they not add a second SFP to the second switch group I would prefer that over 
the POE out port option.. 












Erich Kaiser 
North Central Tower 
[email protected] 
Office: 630-621-4804 
Cell: 630-777-9291 



On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Dennis Burgess < [email protected] > 
wrote: 


Yep, they are working quite well so far, no major issues on them .. we have 
quite a few in stock. 


Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. 
[email protected] – 314-735-0270 x103 – www.linktechs.net 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Af [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop 
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 9:44 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? 

>From MT's point of view, if you need more gigE ports, buy a CCR. 

They save 50 cents per chip, they also get to push a higher margin product. 

Thankfully everything seems to be going gigE now. 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Bill Prince 
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 7:55 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? 


False sense of economy. From an operational standpoint it really 
complicates things. 

bp 
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> 

On 1/23/2016 10:03 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: 
> I never quite understood why they didn’t make all the ports on the 2011 
> GigE. It’s not that they typically all have to be GigE, it’s just an 
> administrative hassle. It’s kind of annoying to have to risk firmware 
> problems on a new CPU type just to get that, if you don’t need the added 
> processor power. And as a business customer demarc, the desktop case with 
> or without WiFi is popular. Not sure what they are thinking. 





Reply via email to