Dennis, As far as horsepower are they comparable to RB1100AHx2? I always think, why did they not add a second SFP to the second switch group I would prefer that over the POE out port option..
Erich Kaiser North Central Tower [email protected] Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Dennis Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep, they are working quite well so far, no major issues on them .. we > have quite a few in stock. > > > Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. > [email protected] – 314-735-0270 x103 – www.linktechs.net > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop > Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 9:44 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? > > From MT's point of view, if you need more gigE ports, buy a CCR. > > They save 50 cents per chip, they also get to push a higher margin product. > > Thankfully everything seems to be going gigE now. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Prince > Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 7:55 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? > > > False sense of economy. From an operational standpoint it really > complicates things. > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 1/23/2016 10:03 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > > I never quite understood why they didn’t make all the ports on the 2011 > > GigE. It’s not that they typically all have to be GigE, it’s just an > > administrative hassle. It’s kind of annoying to have to risk firmware > > problems on a new CPU type just to get that, if you don’t need the added > > processor power. And as a business customer demarc, the desktop case > with > > or without WiFi is popular. Not sure what they are thinking. > >
