I understand I can look at the specs on the routerboard website, but would like to know realworld differences if anyone has noticed anything and how they are performing.
Erich Kaiser North Central Tower [email protected] Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > http://routerboard.com/RB1100AHx2 > http://routerboard.com/RB3011UiAS-RM > > The testing methodologies may be different, but the 3011 shows just > slightly less than 1100AHx2. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Erich Kaiser" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Sunday, January 24, 2016 7:46:21 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? > > Dennis, > > As far as horsepower are they comparable to RB1100AHx2? I always think, > why did they not add a second SFP to the second switch group I would prefer > that over the POE out port option.. > > > Erich Kaiser > North Central Tower > [email protected] > Office: 630-621-4804 > Cell: 630-777-9291 > > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Dennis Burgess <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Yep, they are working quite well so far, no major issues on them .. we >> have quite a few in stock. >> >> >> Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. >> [email protected] – 314-735-0270 x103 – www.linktechs.net >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop >> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 9:44 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? >> >> From MT's point of view, if you need more gigE ports, buy a CCR. >> >> They save 50 cents per chip, they also get to push a higher margin >> product. >> >> Thankfully everything seems to be going gigE now. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bill Prince >> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 7:55 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? >> >> >> False sense of economy. From an operational standpoint it really >> complicates things. >> >> bp >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >> >> On 1/23/2016 10:03 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >> > I never quite understood why they didn’t make all the ports on the 2011 >> > GigE. It’s not that they typically all have to be GigE, it’s just an >> > administrative hassle. It’s kind of annoying to have to risk firmware >> > problems on a new CPU type just to get that, if you don’t need the added >> > processor power. And as a business customer demarc, the desktop case >> with >> > or without WiFi is popular. Not sure what they are thinking. >> >> > >
