Juniper, Brocade, Huawei, Arista, ALU, etc. Actually Cavium makes some decent SoCs really, on the low-mid end.
Will be interesting to see what Ubiquiti and other vendors do with 10+ Gbps routing products. On Jan 24, 2016 4:31 PM, "Jon Langeler" <[email protected]> wrote: > So what are some alternative hardware? > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > On Jan 24, 2016, at 3:33 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wish they'd come out with software that can actually handle more than > 1Gbps per flow on CCR and ditch the low clock per core tile architecture, > it's holding them back. It's great for marketing, but its not very > practical. > On Jan 24, 2016 1:52 PM, "Keefe John" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I wish they'd come out with a 48 port CRS. >> >> On 1/23/2016 9:44 PM, Glen Waldrop wrote: >> >>> From MT's point of view, if you need more gigE ports, buy a CCR. >>> >>> They save 50 cents per chip, they also get to push a higher margin >>> product. >>> >>> Thankfully everything seems to be going gigE now. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Bill Prince >>> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 7:55 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? >>> >>> >>> False sense of economy. From an operational standpoint it really >>> complicates things. >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> On 1/23/2016 10:03 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>> >>>> I never quite understood why they didn’t make all the ports on the 2011 >>>> GigE. It’s not that they typically all have to be GigE, it’s just an >>>> administrative hassle. It’s kind of annoying to have to risk firmware >>>> problems on a new CPU type just to get that, if you don’t need the added >>>> processor power. And as a business customer demarc, the desktop case with >>>> or without WiFi is popular. Not sure what they are thinking. >>>> >>> >>> >>
