Also there’s a slightly faster IPQ8065 now. From: George Skorup Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 5:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik?
Would be cool to see a CRS based on the 3011 like the CRS125 is based on the 2011. And two dual-mode SFP/SFP+ slots. On 1/24/2016 7:50 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: http://routerboard.com/RB1100AHx2 http://routerboard.com/RB3011UiAS-RM The testing methodologies may be different, but the 3011 shows just slightly less than 1100AHx2. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: "Erich Kaiser" mailto:[email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 7:46:21 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? Dennis, As far as horsepower are they comparable to RB1100AHx2? I always think, why did they not add a second SFP to the second switch group I would prefer that over the POE out port option.. Erich Kaiser North Central Tower [email protected] Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Dennis Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: Yep, they are working quite well so far, no major issues on them .. we have quite a few in stock. Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. [email protected] – 314-735-0270 x103 – www.linktechs.net -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 9:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? From MT's point of view, if you need more gigE ports, buy a CCR. They save 50 cents per chip, they also get to push a higher margin product. Thankfully everything seems to be going gigE now. -----Original Message----- From: Bill Prince Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 7:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any news on the RB3011 from Mikrotik? False sense of economy. From an operational standpoint it really complicates things. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 1/23/2016 10:03 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > I never quite understood why they didn’t make all the ports on the 2011 > GigE. It’s not that they typically all have to be GigE, it’s just an > administrative hassle. It’s kind of annoying to have to risk firmware > problems on a new CPU type just to get that, if you don’t need the added > processor power. And as a business customer demarc, the desktop case with > or without WiFi is popular. Not sure what they are thinking.
