Yeah. Something like that. All I recall is it was ~~ 1/4" or so in
diameter. Don't quote me on that. I am disavowing all knowledge.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 2/9/2016 6:37 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
MCM as in MMC? Like MMCX?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Feb 9, 2016 9:34 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The Verizon cell extender (made by Samsung) has a little connector
(don't recall the type, but it's about the size of MCM or so). Put
a wire on the end of the coax, and you're there.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 2/9/2016 10:33 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
How did you get a GPS antenna from the roof to the SCS box?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:28 PM, samuel <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Verizon's Samsung SCS series 3G and 4G Network Extender is
what I was dealing with. We had to run our own GPS antenna
from the roof down to the basement to get the damn thing to
sync properly.
As an aside, I didn't realize the Low E windows were code
now, and this is a very newly renovated building. Will keep
that in mind!
-- Sam Kirsch, Network Tech Support
Plexicomm Internet Solutions
Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 <tel:1.866.759.4678%20x109> |
Fax: 1.866.852.4688 <tel:1.866.852.4688>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> |
Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 <tel:1.866.759.9713>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: "Animal Farm" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: 02/09/16 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender"
cell booster or gps booster?
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390 <tel:915-861-1390>
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Sam Kirsch
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Pull out a GPS App on your phone and make sure you
can actually read the satellites from behind the
window (I used 'GPS Test' on Android). We had to
install one of these boosters and were
troubleshooting why the damn thing wasn't working
when I noticed that my phone GPS receiver was working
in rooms where the windows were open and not working
in rooms where the windows were closed. Building
management didn't even know they'd purchased the
windows with RF film.
*-- Samuel Kirsch, Network Support
Plexicomm - Internet Solutions | www.plexicomm.net
<http://www.plexicomm.net>**
Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109
<http://tel:1.866.759.4678%20x109> | Fax:
1.866.852.4688 <http://tel:1.866.852.4688>*
*Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713
<http://tel:1.866.759.9713> | **
<mailto:[email protected]>*[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>**
------ Original Message ------
From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: 2/9/2016 9:50:42 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender"
It might not be just a matter of getting the
location. If they use the 1pps clock from GPS to
calibrate an oscillator before they start
transmitting, then it would legitimately take 20-30
minutes.
Telrad BTS's are like that too. Pisses me off if I
ever have to reset the power.
On 2/9/2016 12:12 AM, Jason McKemie wrote:
For whatever reason, the receivers that they use in
some of these don't seem to be "modern" at all.
They frequently take an excessively long time to
get a lock.
On Monday, February 8, 2016, Eric Kuhnke
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Modern GPS receivers work surprisingly well, if
not very accurately, from inside a single floor
wood framed house... My oneplus one will pick
up 6 satellites while standing in a central
hallway 15'+ from any window. Should be
accurate enough to get a location within 75'.
All bets are off if it is a concrete framed
apartment building or something like that.
I still find it amazing that anything works at
-162 RSL. Thanks to tiny channel size and very
basic modulation.
On Feb 8, 2016 6:46 PM, "Bill Prince"
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
wrote:
Canopy NAT seems to break it with
regularity. It might also fail if the GPS
location that it reports is not within a
1/4 mile of where the customer address is.
Also requires enough GPS (like near a
window) to get a GPS lock.
bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 2/8/2016 3:34 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
What are the typical reasons for these not
to work?� From the user guide it appears
to use IPSEC, so I assume anything that
prevents a VPN?
�
Verizon support told the customer they
needed a Class A address.� WTF?� Did
they maybe mean it _can't_ be a class A
address?� Customer uses 10.x.x.x
addresses internally, behind Cisco ASA
firewall (which I don't manage).
�
I do see some udp/500 and udp/4500
packets, I think that means something is
using UDP for IPSEC NAT traversal?
